ILAB facilitates opportunities for learning and reflection by publishing learnings documented in project evaluation reports. Lessons learned and promising practices found in these reports are presented here in a searchable database so that these valuable learnings may be considered in the development of new programming. To view the evaluation reports and other research from which these learnings are collected, please see our performance, monitoring and accountability page.
Filters
Evaluation Learnings Search Results
Showing 151 - 160 of 1292Project Title | Evaluation Type | Learning Type |
---|---|---|
Protecting the Working Conditions of People/ Proteje Kondisyon Travay Moun (PWOKONTRAM) Learning Description Interventions aimed at developing social compliance mechanisms should be part of separate initiatives, different from those providing direct action interventions Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description The two-year timeframe is insufficient for the anticipated outcomes; four years of implementation is minimum. Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Integrated interventions are required to tackle the root causes of child labor (education, livelihoods and awareness at a minimum). Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Stakeholders must be consulted on the design of any baseline/prevalence study, as the study advances and before it is finalized. Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Early adaptation of project strategy in line with any changes in the environment is critical to adjust activities and adequately cost for them. (MFS, MFS+ did not align with sector priorities or beneficiary interests.) Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Start VSLA at the same time as the education interventions to ensure that households begin as early as possible to consider saving and IGAs to cover education costs when the project ends. (REACH-T was at least six to nine months behind in its VSLA training vis-à-vis SSK provision). Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Ensure a standardized and well-structured entrepreneurship component for youth training rather than allowing each provider to develop its own approach. Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Review predecessor project conclusions when designing interventions: the REACH project concluded that youth all wanted vocational training and recommended they have the option of choosing between MFS and vocational training. Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Project planning must align to school calendar, e.g., January to December. Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Sector-level sustainability plans should be developed from project outset. Click here to access the report |
|
|
Project Title | Evaluation Type | Learning Type |
---|---|---|
Protecting the Working Conditions of People/ Proteje Kondisyon Travay Moun (PWOKONTRAM) Learning Description Interventions aimed at developing social compliance mechanisms should be part of separate initiatives, different from those providing direct action interventions Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description The two-year timeframe is insufficient for the anticipated outcomes; four years of implementation is minimum. Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Integrated interventions are required to tackle the root causes of child labor (education, livelihoods and awareness at a minimum). Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Stakeholders must be consulted on the design of any baseline/prevalence study, as the study advances and before it is finalized. Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Early adaptation of project strategy in line with any changes in the environment is critical to adjust activities and adequately cost for them. (MFS, MFS+ did not align with sector priorities or beneficiary interests.) Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Start VSLA at the same time as the education interventions to ensure that households begin as early as possible to consider saving and IGAs to cover education costs when the project ends. (REACH-T was at least six to nine months behind in its VSLA training vis-à-vis SSK provision). Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Ensure a standardized and well-structured entrepreneurship component for youth training rather than allowing each provider to develop its own approach. Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Review predecessor project conclusions when designing interventions: the REACH project concluded that youth all wanted vocational training and recommended they have the option of choosing between MFS and vocational training. Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Project planning must align to school calendar, e.g., January to December. Click here to access the report |
|
|
Rwanda Education Alternatives for Children in Tea-Growing Areas (REACH-T) Learning Description Sector-level sustainability plans should be developed from project outset. Click here to access the report |
|
|