This document is about the peer review process and responses to the peer reviews of the scientific assessment that underlies the Department of Labor's Regulatory Impact Analysis for its proposed rule on default investment alternatives under participant directed individual account plans. It discusses the peer review arrangement, the reviewers' critiques, and EBSA's responses, including addressing concerns about welfare effects, the modeling approach, and specific assumptions used in the analysis.
An official website of the United States government.
Here’s how you know
The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
submenu
WORKERS
EMPLOYERS AND ADVISERS
RESEARCHERS
RESOURCES
LAWS AND REGULATIONS
ABOUT
CONTACT US
ESPAÑOL
1-866-444-3272
-
TOPICS
Back
-
-
Health Benefits
- Surprise Billing and Price Transparency
- COBRA Health Continuation Coverage
- Claiming Health Benefits
- Cybersecurity
- Affordable Care Act
- Dependent Coverage
- Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Benefits
- Health Benefits Compliance Assistance
- Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA)
- Proposed Rescission of Association Health Plan Rule
- Retirement Benefits
- Reporting and Filing
Compliance Assistance
-
Health Benefits
-
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back