Employment and Training Administration Advisory System U.S. Department of Labor
Washington, D.C. 20210 |
CLASSIFICATION
OWS CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL OWS/OIS/DFAS DATE May 23, 2003 |
ADVISORY: | UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM LETTER No.26-03 |
TO: | ALL STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES |
FROM: | CHERYL ATKINSON /s/ Administrator Office of Workforce Security | |
SUBJECT: | Experience Rating Index for Rate Years 1998-2002 |
RESCISSIONS | EXPIRATION DATE |
None | May 31, 2004 |
4. ETA 204 Changes. Starting with reports for rate year 1998, a new uniform format for Section C of the ETA 204 report has been in place. Under the old format, employers were grouped by tax rate and then aggregated to larger groups if a state had more than 30 tax rate groups. Thus the number and experience factor ranges of the groups varied widely across states. The new format standardized Section C for three purposes: 1) to allow for electronic submission of Section C; 2) to allow for a uniform methodology across states for calculating the Ineffective Charges (IEC) component of the ERI; and 3) to allow for better analysis of the data. In the new format, employers are grouped by experience factor (e.g. reserve ratio) rather than by tax rate. All states with the same experience rating system are required to use the same groupings of employers. There is one set of groupings for benefit ratio states and another set of groupings for reserve ratio states.
5. Action Required. Please distribute to appropriate staff. As the tables show, many states were unable to provide Section C in the new format for some or all of the years shown. Those states that have not yet programmed the revised Section C are requested to do so as soon as possible, since missing reports severely limit the usefulness of the data. The ETA 204 report is a required report.
6. Inquiries.Direct inquiries to the appropriate Regional Office.
7. Attachments.