JUDGES' BENCHBOOK: Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act
April 16, 2002 [2002 Revision]
 
   
LIEN AGAINST ASSETS  

DISCLAIMER: The Longshore Benchbook was created solely to assist the Office of Administrative Law Judges as a first reference in researching cases arising under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, and extension acts, as amended. This Benchbook does not constitute the official opinion of the Department of Labor, the Office of Administrative Law Judges, or any individual judge on any subject. This Benchbook does not necessarily contain an exhaustive or current treatment of case holdings, and should, under no circumstances, substitute for a party's own research into the statutory, regulatory, and case law authorities on any given subject referred to therein. It is intended to be used as a research tool, not as final legal authority and should not be cited or relied upon as such.

*** Check Supplement ***

SECTION

LIEN AGAINST ASSETS

TOPIC 17

17

GENERALLY

17.1



TOPIC 17 LIEN AGAINST ASSETS

17.1 GENERALLY

     Section 17 of the LHWCA provides:

Where a trust fund which complies with section 302(c) of the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947 (20 U.S.C. 186(c)) established pursuant to a collective-bargaining agreement in effect between an employer and employee covered under this Act has paid disability benefits to an employee which the employee is legally obligated to repay by reason of his entitlement to compensation under this Act or under a settlement, the Secretary shall authorize a lien on such compensation in favor of the trust fund for the amount of such payments.

33 U.S.C. � 917.

     Section 17 provides an exception to Section 16 . If a claimant, who has received disability benefits from a trust fund under Section 302(c) of the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947, is found to be entitled to compensation benefits under the LHWCA or under a settlement, the Secretary shall authorize a lien on these benefits in favor of the trust fund.

     In MacDonald v. Trailer Marine Transport Corp. , 18 BRBS 259 (1986), the Board noted that the judge had properly allowed intervention of the pension fund because it was a Taft-Hartley Trust entitled to a statutory lien on the claimant's compensation under Section 17 of the LHWCA. This lien will be authorized only in favor of a trust fund. Thus, in Harris v. Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. , 6 BRBS 494 (1977), vacated on other grounds sub nom . Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Harris , 578 F.2d 52 ( 3d Cir. 1978), recovery by Aetna of benefits paid claimant under a group sickness and accident plan was denied as not falling within this section.