DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-93,139

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
BOCA RATON, FLORIDA

TA-W-93,139A

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
INCLUDING ON-SITE LEASED WORKERS FROM
KFORCE, APPLEONE, TEKSYSTEMS, ACCOUNTEMPS,
EDGEROCK, P2C2, CORPORATE TECHNOLOGIES, ST. LAWRENCE, APPS
ASSOCIATES, THOUGHTDIGITAL, DELOITTE, OVERTURE PARTNERS,
RITE SOFTWARE, AND ORBIT
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

TA-W-93,139B

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

TA-W-93,139C

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

TA-W-93,139D

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA

TA-W-93,139E

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
COLUMBUS, OHIO



TA-W-93,139F

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
DALLAS, TEXAS

TA-W-93,139G

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
DENVER, COLORADO

TA-W-93,139H

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
EDISON, NEW JERSEY

TA-W-93,139I

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA

TA-W-93,139J

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
HOUSTON, TEXAS

TA-W-93,139K

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE

TA-W-93,139L

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
LISLE, ILLINOIS

TA-W-93,139M

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
MAITLAND, FLORIDA
TA-W-93,139N

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
MANCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE

TA-W-93,139O

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
NEW YORK, NEW YORK

TA-W-93,139P

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
PITTSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA

TA-W-93,139Q

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND

TA-W-93,139R

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA

TA-W-93,139S

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA

TA-W-93,139T

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA

TA-W-93,139U

CDM SMITH INC.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA
Certification Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended ("Act"), 19 U.S.C. § 2273, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of an investigation regarding
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance.
The group eligibility requirements for workers of a firm
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), are
satisfied if the following criteria are met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the
workers in such workers' firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2)(B)(i)(I) there has been a shift by the workers'
firm to a foreign country in the production of
articles or supply of services like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the
workers' firm; OR
(II) there has been an acquisition from a
foreign country by the workers' firm of
articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by
the workers' firm; AND
(ii) the shift/acquisition must have contributed
importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.

The investigation was initiated in response to a petition
filed on September 14, 2017 by a state workforce office on
behalf of workers of CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology
division, Boca Raton, Florida (TA-W-93,139); CDM Smith Inc.,
Information Technology division, including on-site leased
workers from KForce, AppleOne, TekSystems, Accountemps,
Edgerock, P2C2, Corporate Technologies, St. Lawrence, Apps
Associates, ThoughtDigital, Deloitte, Overture Partners, Rite
Software, and OrbIT, Boston, Massachusetts, (TA-W-93,139A); CDM
Smith Inc., Information Technology division, Charleston, South
Carolina (TA-W-93,139B); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology
division, Chicago, Illinois (TA-W-93,139C), CDM Smith Inc.,
Information Technology division, Columbia, South Carolina (TA-W-
93,139D); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Columbus, Ohio (TA-W-93,139E); CDM Smith Inc., Information
Technology division, Dallas, Texas (TA-W-93,139F); CDM Smith
Inc., Information Technology division, Denver, Colorado (TA-W-
93,139G); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Edison, New Jersey (TA-W-93,139H); CDM Smith Inc., Information
Technology division, Fairfax, Virginia (TA-W-93,139I); CDM Smith
Inc., Information Technology division, Houston, Texas (TA-W-
93,139J); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Knoxville, Tennessee (TA-W-93,139K); CDM Smith Inc., Information
Technology division, Lisle, Illinois (TA-W-93,139L); CDM Smith
Inc., Information Technology division, Maitland, Florida (TA-W-
93,139M); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Manchester, New Hampshire (TA-W-93,139N); CDM Smith Inc.,
Information Technology division, New York, New York (TA-W-
93,139O); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, (TA-W-93,139P); CDM Smith Inc.,
Information Technology division, Providence, Rhode Island, (TA-
W-93,139Q); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Raleigh, North Carolina, (TA-W-93,139R); CDM Smith Inc.,
Information Technology division, Rancho Cucamonga, California
(TA-W-93,139S); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Sacramento, California (TA-W-93,139T); and CDM Smith Inc.,
Information Technology division, Walnut Creek, California (TA-W-
93,139U) ("CDM Smith Inc.").
The worker group is engaged in activities related to the
supply of information technology (IT) services.
During the course of the investigation, information was
collected from the petitioner and the workers' firm.
Section 222(a)(1) has been met because a significant
number or proportion of the workers of CDM Smith Inc. have
become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated.
Section 222(a)(2)(B) has been met because the workers'
firm has shifted to a foreign country the supply of a service
like or directly competitive with the services supplied by the
workers which contributed importantly to worker group
separations in CDM Smith Inc.


Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that workers of CDM Smith Inc.,
Information Technology division, Boca Raton, Florida (TA-W-
93,139); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
including on-site leased workers from KForce, AppleOne,
TekSystems, Accountemps, Edgerock, P2C2, Corporate Technologies,
St. Lawrence, Apps Associates, ThoughtDigital, Deloitte,
Overture Partners, Rite Software, and OrbIT, Boston,
Massachusetts, (TA-W-93,139A); CDM Smith Inc., Information
Technology division, Charleston, South Carolina (TA-W-93,139B);
CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division, Chicago,
Illinois (TA-W-93,139C), CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology
division, Columbia, South Carolina (TA-W-93,139D); CDM Smith
Inc., Information Technology division, Columbus, Ohio (TA-W-
93,139E); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Dallas, Texas (TA-W-93,139F); CDM Smith Inc., Information
Technology division, Denver, Colorado (TA-W-93,139G); CDM Smith
Inc., Information Technology division, Edison, New Jersey (TA-W-
93,139H); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Fairfax, Virginia (TA-W-93,139I); CDM Smith Inc., Information
Technology division, Houston, Texas (TA-W-93,139J); CDM Smith
Inc., Information Technology division, Knoxville, Tennessee (TA-
W-93,139K); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Lisle, Illinois (TA-W-93,139L); CDM Smith Inc., Information
Technology division, Maitland, Florida (TA-W-93,139M); CDM Smith
Inc., Information Technology division, Manchester, New Hampshire
(TA-W-93,139N); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
New York, New York (TA-W-93,139O); CDM Smith Inc., Information
Technology division, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, (TA-W-93,139P);
CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division, Providence,
Rhode Island, (TA-W-93,139Q); CDM Smith Inc., Information
Technology division, Raleigh, North Carolina, (TA-W-93,139R);
CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division, Rancho
Cucamonga, California (TA-W-93,139S); CDM Smith Inc.,
Information Technology division, Sacramento, California (TA-W-
93,139T); and CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Walnut Creek, California (TA-W-93,139U) who are engaged in
activities related to the supply of information technology (IT)
services, meet the worker group certification criteria under
Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a). In accordance
with Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2273, I make the
following certification:
"All workers of CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology
division, Boca Raton, Florida (TA-W-93,139); CDM Smith Inc.,
Information Technology division, including on-site leased
workers from KForce, AppleOne, TekSystems, Accountemps,
Edgerock, P2C2, Corporate Technologies, St. Lawrence, Apps
Associates, ThoughtDigital, Deloitte, Overture Partners,
Rite Software, and OrbIT, Boston, Massachusetts, (TA-W-
93,139A); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Charleston, South Carolina (TA-W-93,139B); CDM Smith Inc.,
Information Technology division, Chicago, Illinois (TA-W-
93,139C), CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Columbia, South Carolina (TA-W-93,139D); CDM Smith Inc.,
Information Technology division, Columbus, Ohio (TA-W-
93,139E); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Dallas, Texas (TA-W-93,139F); CDM Smith Inc., Information
Technology division, Denver, Colorado (TA-W-93,139G); CDM
Smith Inc., Information Technology division, Edison, New
Jersey (TA-W-93,139H); CDM Smith Inc., Information
Technology division, Fairfax, Virginia (TA-W-93,139I); CDM
Smith Inc., Information Technology division, Houston, Texas
(TA-W-93,139J); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology
division, Knoxville, Tennessee (TA-W-93,139K); CDM Smith
Inc., Information Technology division, Lisle, Illinois (TA-
W-93,139L); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Maitland, Florida (TA-W-93,139M); CDM Smith Inc.,
Information Technology division, Manchester, New Hampshire
(TA-W-93,139N); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology
division, New York, New York (TA-W-93,139O); CDM Smith Inc.,
Information Technology division, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania,
(TA-W-93,139P); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology
division, Providence, Rhode Island, (TA-W-93,139Q); CDM
Smith Inc., Information Technology division, Raleigh, North
Carolina, (TA-W-93,139R); CDM Smith Inc., Information
Technology division, Rancho Cucamonga, California (TA-W-
93,139S); CDM Smith Inc., Information Technology division,
Sacramento, California (TA-W-93,139T); and CDM Smith Inc.,
Information Technology division, Walnut Creek, California
(TA-W-93,139U), who became totally or partially separated
from employment on or after September 13, 2016 through two
years from the date of certification, and all workers in the
group threatened with total or partial separation from
employment on the date of certification through two years
from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended;
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 4th day of January 2018.

/s/Hope D. Kinglock
______________________________
HOPE D. KINGLOCK
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance