Denied
« back to search results

TAW-92777  /  Macy's Credit and Customer Services, Inc. (Bridgeton, MO)

Petitioner Type: Workers
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 03/31/2017
Most Recent Update: 08/18/2017
Determination Date: 08/18/2017
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-92,777

MACY'S CREDIT AND CUSTOMER SERVICES, INC.
A SUBSIDIARY OF MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.
BRIDGETON, MISSOURI


Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended ("Act"), 19 U.S.C. § 2273, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of an investigation regarding
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance.
Workers of a firm may be eligible for worker adjustment
assistance if they satisfy the criteria of subsection (a), (b)
or (e) of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), (b) and
(e). For the Department of Labor to issue a certification for
workers under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a),
the following criteria must be met:
(1) The first criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(1) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(1)) requires that a significant
number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm
must have become totally or partially separated or be
threatened with total or partial separation.

(2) The second criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(2) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two
ways:

(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the workers' firm
must have decreased absolutely; AND
(ii) (I) imports of articles or services like or directly
competitive with articles or services produced or
supplied by the workers' firm have increased, OR
(II)(aa) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which the
component part produced by the workers' firm was
directly incorporated have increased; OR
(II)(bb) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced
directly using the services supplied by the
workers' firm have increased; OR
(III) imports of articles directly incorporating
component parts not produced in the U.S. that are
like or directly competitive with the article
into which the component part produced by the
workers' firm was directly incorporated have
increased; AND
(iii) the increase in imports described in clause (ii)
contributed importantly to such workers' separation
or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm.

(B) Shift in Production or Supply Path:
(i)(I) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a
foreign country in the production of articles or
supply of services like or directly competitive with
those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; OR
(II) there has been an acquisition from a foreign
country by the workers' firm of articles/services that
are like or directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(ii) the shift described in clause (i)(I) or the
acquisition of articles or services described in
clause (i)(II) contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.

For the Department to issue a secondary worker
certification under Section 222(b) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. §
2272(b), to workers of a Supplier or a Downstream Producer, the
following criteria must be met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in
the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm have become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer
to a firm that employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility under Section
222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), and such
supply or production is related to the article or
service that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) either
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component
parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph
(2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers' firm;
or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the
firm described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers' separation or threat of
separation.

Section 222(c) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(c), defines the
terms "Supplier" and "Downstream Producer."
Workers of a firm may also be considered eligible if they
are publicly identified by name by the International Trade
Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in a category of determination that is
listed in Section 222(e) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(e).
The group eligibility requirements for workers of a firm
under Section 222(e) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(e), can be
satisfied if the following criteria are met:
(1) the workers' firm is publicly identified by name by
the International Trade Commission as a member of a
domestic industry in an investigation resulting in--
(A) an affirmative determination of serious injury or
threat thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) an affirmative determination of market disruption
or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) an affirmative final determination of material
injury or threat thereof under section
705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and
1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) the petition is filed during the 1-year period
beginning on the date on which--
(A) a summary of the report submitted to the
President by the International Trade Commission
under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the
affirmative determination described in paragraph
(1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under
section 202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative determination described
in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal
Register; and
(3) the workers have become totally or partially
separated from the workers' firm within--
(A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b), the 1-year
period preceding the 1-year period described in
paragraph (2).

The investigation was initiated in response to a petition
filed on March 31, 2017 on behalf of workers of Macy's Credit
and Customer Services, Inc., a subsidiary of Macy's Retail
Holdings, Inc., Bridgeton, Missouri (Macy's Credit and
Customer Services). The subject worker group (Macy's Credit and
Customer Services) supplies credit and customer services to the
general public. The subject worker group does not include on-
site leased workers.
The petition states: "When the Bridgeton, MO., call center
closed March 31, 2016, Macys had been suffering an economic
slowdown for sometime. For several years Macys has been
supplementing its U.S., customer service operations by using
call centers in other countries. This of course saves money due
to the lower wages Macys pays those foreign workers. One of the
main reasons given for closing the Bridgeton, MO, call center
was to cut costs by reducing its domestic call centers from four
to three and reorganizing customer service. It did this by
dividing the Bridgeton, MO., location's workload among its three
remaining call centers-one each in Ohio, Arizona, and Florida-as
well as its foreign call centers. Without these overseas
locations to rely on, the reorganization would have been much
more difficult, if not impossible. I believe the workers at
Macys Bridgeton call center were definitely hurt by foreign
trade and overseas workers. The closing of the call center would
probably not have taken place if Macy's did not have its large
number of additional foreign workers to ease the burden of huge
extra workload created by the closing."
During the course of the investigation, information was
collected from the workers' firm, including information
specifically addressing the allegations in the petition.
With respect to Section 222(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that the workers' firm did not, during
the relevant period, increase imports of services like or
directly competitive with the credit and customer services
supplied by Macy's Credit and Customer Services when compared
to the representative base period.
With respect to Section 222(a)(2)(B) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that the workers' firm did not shift the
supply of services like or directly competitive with the credit
and customer services supplied by Macy's Credit and Customer
Services to a foreign country or acquire the supply of such
services from a foreign country. Rather, the supply of credit
and customer services was shifted exclusively to other domestic
facilities.
With respect to Section 222(b)(2) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that Macy's Credit and Customer
Services is not a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm
that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. §
2272(a).
Finally, the group eligibility requirements under Section
222(e) of the Act, have not been satisfied because Criterion (1)
has not been met since the workers' firm has not been publicly
identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a
member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in
an affirmative finding of serious injury, market disruption, or
material injury, or threat thereof.

Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that the requirements of Section 222
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272, have not been met and, therefore,
deny the petition for group eligibility of Macy's Credit and
Customer Services, Inc., a subsidiary of Macy's Retail
Holdings, Inc., Bridgeton, Missouri, to apply for adjustment
assistance, in accordance with Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C.
§ 2273.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 18th day of August 2017.
/s/Del Min Amy Chen
______________________________
DEL MIN AMY CHEN
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance