DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-85,771

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
CFG-FINANCE, PLANNING AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
INCLUDING ON-SITE LEASED WORKERS FROM ADECCO
ROCHESTER, NEW YORK

Notice of Revised Determination
After Statutory Reconsideration

As required by the Trade Adjustment Assistance Reauthorization
Act of 2015 (TAARA 2015), which was enacted as Title IV of the
Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, Public Law No. 114-27,
section 405(a)(1)(A), the investigation into this petition was
reopened for a reconsideration investigation to apply the
requirements for worker group eligibility under chapter 2 of title
II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the TAARA 2015, to the
facts of this petition (statutory reconsideration).
The initial investigation, initiated January 20, 2015,
resulted in a negative determination, issued on February 27, 2015,
that was based on the Department finding that the firm’s
separations are not related to imports or a shift of work overseas.
The determination was applicable to workers and former workers of
Eastman Kodak Company, CFG-Finance, Planning and Analysis
Division, including on-site leased workers from Adecco,
Rochester, New York.
The workers’ firm is engaged in activities related to the
supply of financial services.
Based on information reviewed during the reconsideration
investigation, the Department determines that that the subject firm
shifted services to a foreign country.
Section 222(a)(1) has been met because a significant number
or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally
or partially separated.
Section 222(a)(2)(B) has been met because the workers’ firm
has shifted to a foreign country the supply of a service like or
directly competitive with the service supplied by the workers which
contributed importantly to worker group separations at Eastman
Kodak Company, CFG-Finance, Planning and Analysis Division,
including on-site leased workers from Adecco, Rochester, New
York.
Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that workers of Eastman
Kodak Company, CFG-Finance, Planning and Analysis Division,
including on-site leased workers from Adecco, Rochester, New
York, who are engaged in activities related to the supply of
financial services, meet the worker group certification criteria
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a). In
accordance with Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2273, I make
the following certification:

"All workers of Eastman Kodak Company, CFG-Finance, Planning
and Analysis Division, including on-site leased workers from
Adecco, Rochester, New York who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after January 19, 2014,
through two years from the date of certification, and all
workers in the group threatened with total or partial
separation from employment on the date of certification
through two years from the date of certification, are eligible
to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II
of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.”

Signed in Washington, D.C., this 17th day of January, 2016


/s/Hope D. Kinglock
______________________________
HOPE D. KINGLOCK
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance




DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
TA-W-85,771

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
FINANCE DIVISION
ROCHESTER, NEW YORK

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply For Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended ("Act"), 19 U.S.C. § 2273, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of an investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance.
Workers of a firm may be eligible for worker adjustment
assistance if they satisfy the criteria of subsection (a) and (b)
of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a) and (b). For the
Department of Labor to issue a certification for workers under
Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), the following three
criteria must be met:
(1) The first criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(1) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(1)) requires that a significant
number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated
(2) The second criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(2) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two
ways:
(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the workers' firm must
have decreased absolutely, AND
(ii) imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
increased; and
(iii) the increase described in clause (ii) contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in the sales or
production of such firm or subdivision.

(B) Shift in Production Path:
(i) there has been a shift in production by such workers'
firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like
or directly competitive with articles which are produced
by such firm or subdivision; and
(ii)(I) the country to which the workers' firm has
shifted production of the articles is a party to a free
trade agreement with the United States;
(II)the country to which the workers' firm has
shifted production of the articles is a beneficiary
country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African
Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
(III)there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced by
such firm or subdivision.

For the Department to issue a secondary worker certification
under Section 222(b) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(b), to workers of
a Supplier or a Downstream Producer, the following criteria must be
met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to
a firm that employed a group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), and such supply or production
is related to the article that was the basis for such
certification; and

(3) either
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts
it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or
sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm
described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.


Section 222(c) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(c), defines the
terms "Supplier" and "Downstream Producer."
The investigation was initiated in response to a petition
filed on January 20, 2015 on behalf of workers of Eastman Kodak
Company, Finance Division, Rochester, New York. The workers'
firm is engaged in activities related to the supply of financial
services.
The petitioners claimed that jobs were outsourced to a
foreign country. During the course of the investigation,
information was collected from the workers' firm.
With regard to Sections 222(a)(2)(A) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that the criteria have not been met because
increased imports of articles did not contribute importantly to the
workers' separation.
With regard to Section 222(a)(2)(B) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that the criteria have not been met because
there has not been a shift in the production of articles by the
workers' firm. Rather, the investigation confirmed that the worker
separations are attributable to a shift of financial services to a
foreign country.
With regard to Section 222(b) of the Act, the investigation
revealed that Eastman Kodak is not a Supplier or Downstream
Producer to a firm that employed a TAA-certified worker group.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA), the worker group must be certified eligible to apply for
trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the workers are denied
eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified
eligible for ATAA.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that all workers of Eastman Kodak
Company, Finance Division, Rochester, New York engaged in
activities related to the supply of financial services are denied
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of
the Trade Act of 1974, and are also denied eligibility to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974.

Signed in Washington, D.C. this 27th day of February 2015.

/s/Michael W. Jaffe
______________________________
MICHAEL W. JAFFE
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance