Denied
« back to search results

TAW-85285A  /  Wave Accounting Inc. (Delaware) (Webster, NY)

Petitioner Type: State
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 05/05/2014
Most Recent Update: 01/06/2016
Determination Date: 06/09/2014
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-85,285

WAVE ACCOUNTING INC. (DELAWARE)
INCLUDING WORKERS WHOSE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WAGES WERE
REPORTED THROUGH WAVE ACCOUNTING INC.
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE

TA-W-85,285A

WAVE ACCOUNTING INC. (DELAWARE)
INCLUDING WORKERS WHOSE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WAGES WERE
REPORTED THROUGH WAVE ACCOUNTING INC.
WEBSTER, NEW YORK

Notice of Negative Determination
After Statutory Reconsideration

As required by the Trade Adjustment Assistance Reauthorization
Act of 2015 (TAARA 2015), which was enacted as Title IV of the
Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, Public Law No. 114-27,
section 405(a)(1)(A), the investigation into this petition was
reopened for a reconsideration investigation to apply the
requirements for worker group eligibility under chapter 2 of title
II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the TAARA 2015, to the
facts of this petition (statutory reconsideration).
Wave Accounting Inc (Delaware), including workers whose
unemployment insurance wages were reported through Wave Accounting
Inc., Wilmington, Delaware (TA-W-85,285) and Wave Accounting Inc.
(Delaware), including workers whose unemployment insurance wages
were reported through Wave Accounting Inc., Webster, New York (TA-
W-85,285A) is the subject of this investigation.
The initial investigation, initiated May 5, 2014, resulted
in a negative determination, issued on June 9, 2014, that was
based on the fact that Criterion (1) has not been met because
the firm did not employ a worker group during the relevant time
period. A worker group means that the firm must have at least
three full-time workers during the year preceding the Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) petition date. The subject firm did
not meet this threshold level.
Based on information reviewed during the reconsideration
investigation, the Department of Labor determines that with respect
to Section 222(a) and Section 222(b) of the Act, Criterion (1) has
not been met because the firm did not employ a worker group during
the relevant time period. A worker group means that the firm must
have at least three full-time workers during the year preceding the
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) petition date. The subject firm
did not meet this threshold level.
Finally, the group eligibility requirements under Section
222(e) of the Act, have not been satisfied either because the
workers’ firm has not been publically identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry
in an investigation resulting in an affirmative finding of serious
injury, market disruption, or material injury, or threat thereof.

Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that the requirements of
Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272, have not been met and,
therefore, deny the petition for group eligibility of Wave
Accounting Inc (Delaware), including workers whose unemployment
insurance wages were reported through Wave Accounting Inc.,
Wilmington, Delaware (TA-W-85,285) and Wave Accounting Inc.
(Delaware), including workers whose unemployment insurance wages
were reported through Wave Accounting Inc., Webster, New York (TA-
W-85,285A) who were engaged in activities related to the production
of online accounting software that enables customers to calculate
their employee payrolls, to apply for adjustment assistance, in
accordance with Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2273.

Signed in Washington, D.C. this 6th day of January, 2016


/s/Jessica R. Webster
______________________________
JESSICA R. WEBSTER
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance




DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-85,285

WAVE ACCOUNTING INC. (DELAWARE)
INCLUDING WORKERS WHOSE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WAGES WERE
REPORTED THRU WAVE ACCOUNTING INC.
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE

TA-W-85,285A

WAVE ACCOUNTING INC. (DELAWARE)
INCLUDING WORKERS WHOSE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WAGES WERE
REPORTED THRU WAVE ACCOUNTING INC.
WEBSTER, NEW YORK

Negative Determinations Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended ("Act"), 19 U.S.C. § 2273, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of an investigation regarding
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance.
Workers of a firm may be eligible for worker adjustment
assistance if they satisfy the criteria of subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a) and (b). For
the Department of Labor to issue a certification for workers
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), the
following criteria must be met:
(1) The first criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(1) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(1)) requires that a significant
number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm,
or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated
(2) The second criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(2) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two
ways:
(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the workers' firm
must have decreased absolutely, AND
(ii) imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
increased; and
(iii) the increase described in clause (ii) contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in the sales or
production of such firm or subdivision.

(B) Shift in Production Path:
(i) there has been a shift in production by such workers'
firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles
like or directly competitive with articles which are
produced by such firm or subdivision; and
(ii)(I) the country to which the workers' firm has
shifted production of the articles is a party to a
free trade agreement with the United States;
(II)the country to which the workers' firm has
shifted production of the articles is a beneficiary
country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African
Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
(III)there has been or is likely to be an increase
in imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

For the Department to issue a secondary worker
certification under Section 222(b) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. §
2272(b), to workers of a Supplier or a Downstream Producer, the
following criteria must be met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in
the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm have become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;

(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer
to a firm that employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility under Section
222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), and such
supply or production is related to the article that
was the basis for such certification; and

(3) either
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component
parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph
(2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm
described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers' separation or threat of separation.

Section 222(c) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(c), defines the
terms "Supplier" and "Downstream Producer."
The investigation was initiated in response to a petition
filed on May 5, 2014 by a American Job Center on behalf of
workers of Wave Accounting Inc. (Delaware), including workers
whose unemployment insurance wages were reported through Wave
Accounting Inc., Wilmington, Delaware (TA-W-85,285) and Wave
Accounting Inc. (Delaware), including workers whose
unemployment insurance wages were reported through Wave
Accounting Inc., Webster, New York (TA-W-85,285A). The
workers' firm is engaged in activities related to the production
of online accounting software that enables customers to
calculate their employee payrolls.
The petitioner alleged the following, "US Payroll Tax
Support, which has been handled by the US Corporation, has been
shift to the company's headquarters in Canada."
During the course of the investigation, information was
collected from the workers' firm and the petitioner.
With respect to Section 222(a) and Section 222(b) of the
Act, the investigation revealed that Criterion (1) has not been
met because the firm did not employ a worker group during the
relevant time period. A worker group means that the firm must
have at least three full-time workers during the year preceding
the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) petition date. The
subject firm did not meet this threshold level. There were only
two workers within the United States.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA), the worker group must be certified eligible to apply for
trade adjustment assistance. Since the workers are denied
eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified
eligible for ATAA.


Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that all workers of Wave Accounting
Inc. (Delaware), including workers whose unemployment
insurance wages were reported through Wave Accounting Inc.,
Wilmington, Delaware (TA-W-85,285) and Wave Accounting Inc.
(Delaware), including workers whose unemployment insurance
wages were reported through Wave Accounting Inc., Webster, New
York (TA-W-85,285A) engaged in activities related to the
production of online accounting software are denied eligibility
to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, and are also denied eligibility
to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, amended.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 9th day of June, 2014


/s/Michael W. Jaffe
______________________________
MICHAEL W. JAFFE
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance