DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-85,113

ROCKTENN COMPANY
SOUTHEAST TEXAS BUSINESS UNIT
GRAND PRAIRIE CONTAINER
GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS

Notice of Negative Determination
After Statutory Reconsideration

As required by the Trade Adjustment Assistance Reauthorization
Act of 2015 (TAARA 2015), which was enacted as Title IV of the
Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, Public Law No. 114-27,
section 405(a)(1)(A), the investigation into this petition was
reopened for a reconsideration investigation to apply the
requirements for worker group eligibility under chapter 2 of title
II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the TAARA 2015, to the
facts of this petition (statutory reconsideration).
The initial investigation, initiated March 4, 2014, resulted
in a negative determination, issued on April 11, 2014, that was
based on the findings that the subject firm did not import from a
foreign country articles like or directive competitive with the
corrugated boxes produced by the workers of the subject firm nor
did the firm shift production of articles like or directly
competitive with corrugated boxes to a foreign country. The
determination was applicable to workers of Rocktenn Company,
Southeast Texas Business Unit, Grand Prairie Container, Grand
Prairie, Texas (hereafter referred to “RockTenn” or “the subject
firm”). The workers’ firm is engaged in activities related to the
production of corrugated boxes.
Based on information reviewed during the reconsideration
investigation, the Department of Labor determines that the
requirements for certification have not been met.
During the course of the investigation, information was
collected from the workers’ firm and its major declining
customers.
With respect to Section 222(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that neither firm nor customer imports of
articles like or directly competitive with corrugated boxes
produced by Rocktenn Company, Southeast Texas Business Unit,
Grand Prairie Container, Grand Prairie, Texas, have increased.
With respect to Section 222(a)(2)(B) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that the firm did not shift the production
of corrugated boxes or a like or directly competitive article to
a foreign country or acquire corrugated boxes or a like or
directly competitive article from a foreign country.
With respect to Section 222(b)(2) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that Rocktenn Company, Southeast Texas
Business Unit, Grand Prairie Container, Grand Prairie, Texas is
not a Supplier to a firm that employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a).
With respect to Section 222(b)(2) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that Rocktenn Company, Southeast Texas
Business Unit, Grand Prairie Container, Grand Prairie, Texas does
not act as a Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group
of workers who received a certification of eligibility under
Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a).
Finally, the group eligibility requirements under Section
222(e) of the Act, have not been satisfied either because Criterion
(1) has not been met since the workers’ firm has not been publicly
identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a
member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in an
affirmative finding of serious injury, market disruption, or
material injury, or threat thereof.

Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that the requirements of
Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272, have not been met and,
therefore, deny the petition for group eligibility of Rocktenn
Company, Southeast Texas Business Unit, Grand Prairie Container,
Grand Prairie, Texas whose workers are engaged in activities
related to the production of corrugated boxes, to apply for
adjustment assistance, in accordance with Section 223 of the Act,
19 U.S.C. § 2273.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 27th day of April, 2016


/s/Jessica R. Webster
______________________________
JESSICA R. WEBSTER
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment AssistanceDEPARTMENT OF LABOR



Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-85,113

ROCKTENN COMPANY
SOUTHEAST TEXAS BUSINESS UNIT
GRAND PRAIRIE CONTAINER
GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS

Negative Determinations Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended ("Act"), 19 U.S.C. § 2273, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of an investigation regarding
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance.
Workers of a firm may be eligible for worker adjustment
assistance if they satisfy the criteria of subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a) and (b). For
the Department of Labor to issue a certification for workers
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), the
following three criteria must be met:
(1) The first criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(1) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(1)) requires that a significant
number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm,
or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated
(2) The second criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(2) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two
ways:

(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the workers' firm
must have decreased absolutely, AND
(ii) imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
increased; and
(iii) the increase described in clause (ii) contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in the sales or
production of such firm or subdivision.
(B) Shift in Production Path:
(i) there has been a shift in production by such workers'
firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles
like or directly competitive with articles which are
produced by such firm or subdivision; and
(ii)(I) the country to which the workers' firm has
shifted production of the articles is a party to a
free trade agreement with the United States;
(II)the country to which the workers' firm has
shifted production of the articles is a beneficiary
country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African
Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
(III)there has been or is likely to be an increase
in imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

For the Department to issue a secondary worker
certification under Section 222(b) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. §
2272(b), to workers of a Supplier or a Downstream Producer, the
following criteria must be met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in
the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm have become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer
to a firm that employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility under Section
222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), and such
supply or production is related to the article that
was the basis for such certification; and
(3) either
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component
parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph
(2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm
described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers' separation or threat of separation.

Section 222(c) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(c), defines the
terms "Supplier" and "Downstream Producer."
The investigation was initiated in response to a petition
filed on March 4, 2014 by the International Brotherhood of
Teamsters, Local 745, on behalf of workers of Rocktenn Company,
Southeast Texas Business Unit, Grand Prairie Container, Grand
Prairie, Texas (hereafter referred to "RockTenn" or "the
subject firm"). The workers' firm is engaged in activities
related to the production of corrugated boxes.
The petition alleges that the subject firm has shifted
production of boxes to a foreign country.
During the course of the investigation, information was
collected from the workers' firm and its major declining
customer.
With respect to Section 222(a)(2)(B) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that RockTenn did not shift the
production of corrugated boxes, or like or directly competitive
articles, to a foreign country which is a party to free trade
agreement with the United States, to a beneficiary country
under the African Growth and Opportunity Act or the Caribbean
Basin Economic Recovery Act, or any other foreign country.
With respect to Section 222(a)(2)(A)(ii), the
investigation revealed no increase in imports of corrugated
boxes, or like or directly competitive articles, by the subject
firm. The Department conducted a survey of RockTenn's largest
declining customer, which revealed no increased imports of
corrugated boxes, or like or directly competitive articles,
during the relevant period.
With respect to Section 222(b)(2) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that RockTenn is not a Supplier to, or
act as a Downstream Producer for, a firm (or subdivision,
whichever is applicable) that employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of
the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), based on an increase in imports
from, or a shift in production to, Canada or Mexico.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA), the worker group must be certified eligible to apply for
trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the workers are denied
eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified
eligible for ATAA.


Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that all workers of Rocktenn Company,
Southeast Texas Business Unit, Grand Prairie Container, Grand
Prairie, Texas, are denied eligibility to apply for adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, and are also denied eligibility to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974, amended.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 11th day of April 2014.

/s/Del Min Amy Chen
______________________________
DEL MIN AMY CHEN
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance