DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-85,069

ALLSTATE INSURANCE (ALLSTATE)
A SUBSIDIARY OF THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION
ALLSTATE TECHNOLOGY & OPERATIONS (ATO): POLICY ADMINISTRATION
INCLUDING ON-SITE LEASED WORKERS FROM KELLY SERVICES
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA

Notice of Negative Determination
After Statutory Reconsideration

As required by the Trade Adjustment Assistance
Reauthorization Act of 2015 (TAARA 2015), which was enacted as
Title IV of the Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, Public
Law No. 114-27, section 405(a)(1)(A), the investigation into
this petition was reopened for a reconsideration investigation
to apply the requirements for worker group eligibility under
chapter 2 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by
the TAARA 2015, to the facts of this petition (statutory
reconsideration).
The initial investigation, initiated on February 12, 2014,
resulted in a negative determination, issued on March 24, 2014
that was based on the Department’s finding that the subject firm
does not produce an article. The determination was applicable to
workers and former workers of Allstate Insurance, a subsidiary
of The Allstate Corporation, Allstate Technology & Operations
(ATO): Policy Administration, including on-site leased workers
from Kelly Services, Roanoke, Virginia (hereafter referred to as
“Allstate-ATO”). Workers of Allstate-ATO are engaged in
activities related to the supply of auditing, data entry, and
classroom training services for Allstate employees and agents.
Based on information reviewed during the reconsideration
investigation, the Department determines that the requirements
for certification have not been met.
With respect to Section 222(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that Allstate Insurance has not
increased imports of services like or directly competitive
with the auditing, data entry, and classroom training services
supplied by Allstate-ATO. Because these services were provided
internally, the Department did not conduct a customer survey.
With respect to Section 222(a)(2)(B) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that the subject firm did not shift the
supply of internal auditing, data entry, and classroom
training services, or like or directly competitive services,
to a foreign country or acquire the supply of internal
auditing, data entry, and classroom training services, or
like or directly competitive services, from a foreign country.
Rather, the supply of internal auditing, data entry, and
classroom training services remains at Roanoke, Virginia.
With respect to Section 222(b)(2) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that Allstate-ATO is not a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a).
Finally, the group eligibility requirements under Section
222(e) of the Act, have not been satisfied because Criterion (1)
has not been met since the workers’ firm has not been publicly
identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a
member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in
an affirmative finding of serious injury, market disruption, or
material injury, or threat thereof.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that the requirements of Section 222
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272, have not been met and, therefore,
deny the petition for group eligibility of Allstate Insurance,
(Allstate) a subsidiary of The Allstate Corporation, Allstate
Technology & Operations (ATO): Policy Administration, including
on-site leased workers from Kelly Services, Roanoke, Virginia,
to apply for adjustment assistance, in accordance with Section
223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2273.

Signed in Washington, D.C. this 19th day of March, 2016

/s/Del Min Amy Chen
______________________________
DEL MIN AMY CHEN
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance





DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-85,069

ALLSTATE INSURANCE
A SUBSIDIARY OF THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION
ALLSTATE TECHNOLOGY & OPERATIONS (ATO): POLICY ADMINISTRATION
INCLUDING ON-SITE LEASED WORKERS FROM KELLY SERVICES
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply For Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended ("Act"), 19 U.S.C. § 2273, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of an investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance.
Workers of a firm may be eligible for worker adjustment
assistance if they satisfy the criteria of subsection (a) and (b) of
Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a) and (b). For the
Department of issue a certification for workers under Section 222(a)
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), the following criteria must be met:
(1) The first criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(1) of the Act,
19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(1)) requires that a significant number or
proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an
appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;

(2) The second criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(2) of the Act,
19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two ways:
(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the workers' firm must
have decreased absolutely, AND
(ii) imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
increased; and
(iii) the increase described in clause (ii) contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in the sales or production of
such firm or subdivision.

(B) Shift in Production Path:
(i) there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and
(ii)(I) the country to which the workers' firm has
shifted production of the articles is a party to a free
trade agreement with the United States;
(II)the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and
Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
(III)there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced by
such firm or subdivision.

For the Department to issue a secondary worker certification
under Section 222(b) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(b), to workers of a
Supplier or a Downstream Producer, the following criteria must be
met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), and such supply or production is
related to the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) either
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted
for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm
described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.

Section 222(c) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(c), defines the
terms "Supplier" and "Downstream Producer."
The investigation was initiated in response to a petition filed
on February 12, 2014 on behalf of workers of Allstate Insurance, a
subsidiary of The Allstate Corporation, Allstate Technology &
Operations (ATO): Policy Administration, including on-site leased
workers from Kelly Services, Roanoke, Virginia (hereafter referred
to "Allstate" or "the subject firm"). The workers' firm is engaged
in activities related to the supply of internal data entry classroom
training services.
The petition states that the workers are "trainers, auditing,
global trainers" and that the workers' separations are due to
"Production sent to foreign countries- mainly India."
During the course of the investigation, information was
collected from the workers' firm.
The investigation revealed that Salience does not produce an
article within the meaning of Section 222(a) or Section 222(b) of the
Act. In order to be considered eligible to apply for adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, the worker
group seeking certification (or on whose behalf certification is
being sought) must work for a "firm" or appropriate subdivision that
produces an article. The definition of a firm includes an individual
proprietorship, partnership, joint venture, association, corporation
(including a development corporation), business trust, cooperative,
trustee in bankruptcy, and receiver under decree of any court.
During the investigation, the Department obtained information
that revealed that the workers' firm did not produce an article;
instead, the workers' firm supplies services related to the supply of
internal data entry classroom training services.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA), the worker group must be certified eligible to apply for
trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the workers are denied
eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified
eligible for ATAA.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the investigation,
I determine that all workers of Allstate Insurance, a subsidiary of
The Allstate Corporation, Allstate Technology & Operations (ATO):
Policy Administration, including on-site leased workers from Kelly
Services, Roanoke, Virginia, are denied eligibility to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and
are also denied eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed in Washington, D.C., this 24th day of March, 2014


/s/Del Min Amy Chen
______________________________
DEL MIN AMY CHEN
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance