DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-83,165

TEXAS/NEW MEXICO NEWSPAPER PARTNERSHIP
D/B/A YORK NEWSPAPER COMPANY (YNC)
DESIGN TEAM
YORK, PENNSYLVANIA

TA-W-83,165A

TEXAS/NEW MEXICO NEWSPAPER PARTNERSHIP
D/B/A CHAMBERSBURG PUBLIC OPINION (PO)
DESIGN TEAM
CHAMBERSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA

TA-W-83,165B

TEXAS/NEW MEXICO NEWSPAPER PARTNERSHIP
D/B/A LEBANON DAILY NEWS (LDN)
DESIGN TEAM
LEBANON, PENNSYLVANIA

TA-W-83,165C

TEXAS/NEW MEXICO NEWSPAPER PARTNERSHIP
D/B/A HANOVER EVENING SUN (HAN)
DESIGN TEAM
HANOVER, PENNSYLVANIA


Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended ("Act"), 19 U.S.C. § 2273, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of an investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance.
Workers of a firm may be eligible for worker adjustment
assistance if they satisfy the criteria of subsection (a), (b) or
(e) of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), (b) and (e).
For the Department of Labor to issue a certification for workers
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), the
following three criteria must be met:
(1) The first criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(1) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2282(a)(1)) requires that a significant
number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm must
have become totally or partially separated or be threatened
with total or partial separation.
(2) The second criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(2) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two
ways:
(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the workers' firm must
have decreased absolutely, AND
(ii) (I) imports of articles or services like or directly
competitive with articles or services produced or
supplied by the workers' firm have increased, OR
(II)(aa) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which the component
part produced by the workers' firm was directly
incorporated have increased; OR
(II)(bb) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced
directly using the services supplied by the
workers' firm have increased; OR
(III) imports of articles directly incorporating
component parts not produced in the U.S. that are
like or directly competitive with the article into
which the component part produced by the workers'
firm was directly incorporated have increased.
(iii) the increase in imports described in clause (ii)
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or
production of such firm.
(B) Shift in Production or Supply Path:
(i)(I) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a
foreign country in the production of articles or supply
of services like or directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers' firm; OR
(II) there has been an acquisition from a foreign
country by the workers' firm of articles/services that
are like or directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(ii) the shift described in clause (i)(I) or the acquisition
of articles or services described in clause (i)(II)
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation.

Section 222(c) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(c), defines the
terms "Supplier" and "Downstream Producer." For the Department to
issue a secondary worker certification under Section 222(b) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(b), to workers of a Supplier or a Downstream
Producer, the following criteria must be met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer
to a firm that employed a group of workers who received
a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of
the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was
the basis for such certification; and

(3) either
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component
parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or
sales of the workers' firm;
or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the
firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly
to the workers' separation or threat of separation.

Workers of a firm may also be considered eligible if they
are publicly identified by name by the International Trade
Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in a category of determination that is listed in
Section 222(e) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(e).
The group eligibility requirements for workers of a firm
under Section 222(e) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(e), can be
satisfied if the following criteria are met:
(1) the workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic
industry in an investigation resulting in--
(A) an affirmative determination of serious injury or
threat thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) an affirmative determination of market disruption
or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) an affirmative final determination of material
injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A)
or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));

(2) the petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning
on the date on which--
(A) a summary of the report submitted to the President
by the International Trade Commission under section
202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative
determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section
202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal
Register; and

(3) the workers have become totally or partially
separated from the workers' firm within--
(A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year
period preceding the 1-year period described in
paragraph (2).

The investigation was initiated in response to a petition
filed on October 23, 2013 by a company official on behalf of
workers who supply graphic design (advertisement) services of
Texas/New Mexico Newspaper Partnership, d/b/a York Newspaper
Company, Design Team, York, Pennsylvania (TA-W-83,165); Texas/New
Mexico Newspaper Partnership, d/b/a Chambersburg Public Opinion,
Design Team, Chambersburg, Pennsylvania (TA-W-83,165A); Texas/New
Mexico Newspaper Partnership, d/b/a Lebanon Daily News, Design
Team, Lebanon, Pennsylvania (TA-W-83,165B); and Texas/New Mexico
Newspaper Partnership, d/b/a Hanover Evening Sun, Design Team,
Hanover, Pennsylvania (TA-W-83,165C) (collectively referred to as
the subject firm). The workers' firm supplies graphical design
advertising services. Members of the Design Team are located at
multiple locations but are part of the same unit.
The petition states that "Separations occurred in October of
2012. Graphic design work was outsourced to . . . an American
company that uses resources in India and the Philippines to create
digital and print ads for newspapers and other media companies."
With respect to Section 222(a) and Section 222(b) of the Act,
the investigation revealed that Criterion (1) has not been met
because a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have not become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened with such separation. 29 CFR 90.2 states that
"Significant number of proportion of the workers means that: (a)
In most cases the total or partial separations, or both, in a firm
or appropriate subdivision thereof, are the equivalent to a total
unemployment of five percent (5 percent) of the workers or 50
workers, whichever is less."
Finally, the group eligibility requirements under Section
222(e) of the Act, have not been satisfied because the workers'
firm has not been publicly identified by name by the International
Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in an affirmative finding of serious
injury, market disruption, or material injury, or threat thereof.



Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that the requirements of Section 222 of
the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272, have not been met and, therefore, deny
the petition for group eligibility of workers of Texas/New Mexico
Newspaper Partnership, d/b/a York Newspaper Company, Design Team,
York, Pennsylvania (TA-W-83,165); Texas/New Mexico Newspaper
Partnership, d/b/a Chambersburg Public Opinion, Design Team,
Chambersburg, Pennsylvania (TA-W-83,165A); Texas/New Mexico
Newspaper Partnership, d/b/a Lebanon Daily News, Design Team,
Lebanon, Pennsylvania (TA-W-83,165B); and Texas/New Mexico
Newspaper Partnership, d/b/a Hanover Evening Sun, Design Team,
Hanover, Pennsylvania (TA-W-83,165C), who are engaged in
activities related to the supply of graphical design advertising
services, to apply for adjustment assistance, in accordance with
Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2273.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 27th day of November, 2013


//Del Min Amy Chen
______________________________
DEL MIN AMY CHEN
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance