DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-80,301

CAPGEMINI AMERICA, INC.
APPLICATIONS OUTSOURCING, INFRASTRUCTURE OUTSOURCING, AND
BUSINESS PROCESS OUTSOURCING
INCLUDING ON-SITE LEASED WORKERS FROM WORLD NETWORKING
SERVICES, HR SELECT, MILLENNIUM, SOGETI, AXIOM, ICC, SAICON,
AND IT TRAILBLAZERS
LEE’S SUMMIT, MISSOURI

Notice of Revised Determination
on Reconsideration

The initial investigation, initiated July 20, 2011, resulted
in a negative determination, issued on September 23, 2011, that
was based on the finding that the firm did not produce an
article. The determination was applicable to workers and former
workers of Capgemini America, Inc., Applications Outsourcing,
Infrastructure Outsourcing, and Business Process Outsourcing,
Lee’s Summit, Missouri. The notice of determination was published
in the Federal Register on October 7, 2011 (76 FR 62453). The
workers’ firm is engaged in activities related to the supply of
information technology and outsourcing services.
The workers group includes on-site leased workers from World
Networking Services, HR Select, Millennium, Sogeti, Axiom, ICC,
Saicon, and IT Trailblazers.
As required by the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) Extension
Act of 2011 (the TAAEA), the investigation into this petition was
reopened for a reconsideration investigation to apply the
requirements for worker group eligibility under chapter 2 of title
II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the TAAEA, to the facts
of this petition.
Based on information reviewed during the reconsideration
investigation, the Department of Labor determines that a shift in
services to a foreign country contributed importantly to subject
worker group separations.
Section 222(a)(1) has been met because a significant number
or proportion of the subject worker group have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened with such separation.
Section 222(a)(2)(B) has been met because the workers’ firm
has shifted to a foreign country the supply of services like or
directly competitive with those supplied by the subject workers
which contributed importantly to separations at Capgemini
America, Inc., Applications Outsourcing, Infrastructure
Outsourcing, and Business Process Outsourcing, Lee’s Summit,
Missouri.
Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that workers of Capgemini
America, Inc., Applications Outsourcing, Infrastructure
Outsourcing, and Business Process Outsourcing, Lee’s Summit,
Missouri, who were engaged in employment related to the supply of
information technology and outsourcing services, meet the worker
group certification criteria under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19
U.S.C. § 2272(a). In accordance with Section 223 of the Act, 19
U.S.C. § 2273, I make the following certification:
"All workers of Capgemini America, Inc., Applications
Outsourcing, Infrastructure Outsourcing, and Business
Process Outsourcing, including on-site leased workers from
World Networking Services, HR Select, Millennium, Sogeti,
Axiom, ICC, Saicon, and IT Trailblazers, Lee’s Summit,
Missouri, who became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after July 18, 2010, through two years from
the date of this certification, and all workers in the group
threatened with total or partial separation from employment on
December 20, 2011 through two years from the date of
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance
under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended.”
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 2nd day of December, 2011

/s/ Del Min Amy Chen
_____________________________
DEL MIN AMY CHEN
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
TA-W-80,301

CAPGEMINI AMERICA, INC.
APPLICATIONS OUTSOURCING, INFRASTRUCTURE OUTSOURCING, AND
BUSINESS PROCESS OUTSOURCING
LEE’S SUMMIT, MISSOURI

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply For Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. § 2273, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of an investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance.
Workers of a firm may be eligible for worker adjustment
assistance if they satisfy the criteria of subsection (a) and (b)
of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a) and (b). For the
Department of Labor to issue a certification for workers under
Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), the following three
criteria must be met:
(1) The first criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(1) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(1)) requires that a significant
number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated
(2) The second criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(2) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two
ways:
(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the workers’ firm must
have decreased absolutely, AND
(ii) imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
increased; and
(iii) the increase described in clause (ii) contributed
importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in the sales or
production of such firm or subdivision.

(B) Shift in Production Path:
(i) there has been a shift in production by such workers’
firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like
or directly competitive with articles which are produced
by such firm or subdivision; and
(ii)(I) the country to which the workers’ firm has
shifted production of the articles is a party to a free
trade agreement with the United States;
(II)the country to which the workers’ firm has
shifted production of the articles is a beneficiary
country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African
Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
(III)there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced by
such firm or subdivision.

For the Department to issue a secondary worker certification
under Section 222(b) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(b), to workers of
a Supplier or a Downstream Producer, the following criteria must be
met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) the workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to
a firm that employed a group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), and such supply or production
is related to the article that was the basis for such
certification; and

(3) either
(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts
it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or
sales of the workers’ firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm
described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers’ separation or threat of separation.

Section 222(c) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(c), defines the
terms “Supplier” and “Downstream Producer.”
The investigation was initiated in response to a petition
filed on July 20, 2011 by three workers on behalf of workers of
Capgemini America, Inc., Applications Outsourcing, Infrastructure
Outsourcing, and Business Process Outsourcing, Lee’s Summit,
Missouri. The workers’ firm is engaged in activities related to the
supply of information technology and outsourcing services.
The petitioners allege that the subject firm is shifting
services to a foreign country.
During the course of the investigation, information was
collected from the workers’ firm.
The investigation revealed that Capgemini America, Inc.,
does not produce an article within the meaning of Section 222(a) or
Section 222(b) of the Act. Rather, the workers’ firm supplied
services related to information technology and outsourcing. In
order to be considered eligible to apply for adjustment assistance
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, the worker group
seeking certification (or on whose behalf certification is being
sought) must work for a “firm” or appropriate subdivision that
produces an article. The definition of a firm includes an
individual proprietorship, partnership, joint venture, association,
corporation (including a development corporation), business trust,
cooperative, trustee in bankruptcy, and receiver under decree of
any court.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA), the worker group must be certified eligible to apply for
trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the workers are denied
eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified
eligible for ATAA.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that all workers of Capgemini America,
Inc., Applications Outsourcing, Infrastructure Outsourcing, and
Business Process Outsourcing, Lee’s Summit, Missouri are denied
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of
the Trade Act of 1974, and are also denied eligibility to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 23rd day of September, 2011


/s/Michael W. Jaffe
______________________________
MICHAEL W. JAFFE
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance








- 7 -