DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-74,281

HUMANA INSURANCE COMPANY
A DIVISION OF CARENETWORK, INC.
FRONT END OPERATIONS AND ACCOUNT INSTALLATION-
PRODUCT TESTING GROUPS
DE PERE, WISCONSIN

Notice of Revised Determination
on Reconsideration

By applications dated August 23, 2010 and September 9, 2010,
petitioners requested administrative reconsideration of the
Department's negative determination regarding the eligibility of
workers and former workers of Humana Insurance Company, a Division
of CareNetwork, Inc., Front End Operations and Account
Installation-Product Testing Groups, Green Bay, Wisconsin, to apply
for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA).
On September 9, 2010, the Department issued a Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for
Reconsideration. The Department’s Notice was published in the
Federal Register on September 21, 2010 (75 FR 57502).
During the reconsideration investigation, the Department
received information that the worker group is in De Pere, and not
Green Bay, Wisconsin. Accordingly, the subject workers are workers
at Humana Insurance Company, a Division of CareNetwork, Inc., Front
End Operations and Account Installation-Product Testing Groups, De
Pere, Wisconsin, who are engaged in employment related to the
supply of health insurance benefits.
During the reconsideration investigation, the Department
confirmed that a significant proportion or number of workers at
Humana Insurance Company, a Division of CareNetwork, Inc., Front
End Operations and Account Installation-Product Testing Groups, De
Pere, Wisconsin, was totally or partially separated, or threatened
with such separation, during the relevant period.
Based on the new information obtained during the
reconsideration investigation, the Department determines that the
subject firm shifted to a foreign country the supply of services
like or directly competitive with those provided by the Front End
Operations and Account Installation-Product Testing Groups, De
Pere, Wisconsin, and that the shift contributed importantly to
worker group separations.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional facts obtained during
the reconsideration investigation, I determine that workers of
Humana Insurance Company, a Division of CareNetwork, Inc., Front
End Operations and Account Installation-Product Testing Groups, De
Pere, Wisconsin, who are engaged in employment related to the
supply of health insurance benefits, meet the worker group
certification criteria under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. §
2272(a). In accordance with Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. §
2273, I make the following certification:
“All workers of Humana Insurance Company, a Division of
CareNetwork, Inc., Front End Operations and Account
Installation-Product Testing Groups, De Pere, Wisconsin, who
are engaged in employment related to the supply of health
insurance benefits, who became totally or partially separated
from employment on or after June 11, 2009, through two years
from the date of this revised certification, and all workers
in the group threatened with total or partial separation from
employment on date of certification through two years from the
date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of
1974, as amended.”
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 9th day of November, 2010

/s/ Del Min Amy Chen
______________________________
DEL MIN AMY CHEN
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance

4510-FN-P


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-74,281

HUMANA INSURANCE COMPANY
A DIVISION OF CARENETWORK, INC.
GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. § 2273, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of an investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance.
Workers of a firm may be eligible for worker adjustment
assistance if they satisfy the criteria of subsection (a), (c) or
(f) of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), (c), (f). For
the Department of Labor to issue a certification for workers under
Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), the following three
criteria must be met:
I. The first criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(1) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2282(a)(1)) requires that a significant
number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm must
have become totally or partially separated or be threatened
with total or partial separation.

II. The second criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(2) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two
ways:
(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the workers’ firm must
have decreased absolutely, AND
(ii) (I) imports of articles or services like or directly
competitive with articles or services produced or
supplied by the workers’ firm have increased, OR
(II)(aa) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which the component
part produced by the workers’ firm was directly
incorporated have increased; OR
(II)(bb) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced
directly using the services supplied by the
workers’ firm have increased; OR
(III) imports of articles directly incorporating
component parts not produced in the U.S. that are
like or directly competitive with the article into
which the component part produced by the workers’
firm was directly incorporated have increased.

(B) Shift in Production or Supply Path:
(i)(I) there has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a
foreign country in the production of articles or supply
of services like or directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; OR
(i)(II) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country
by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like
or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by
the workers’ firm.

III. The third criterion requires that the increase in imports or
shift/acquisition must have contributed importantly to the
workers’ separation or threat of separation. See Sections
222(a)(2)(A)(iii) and 222(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act, 19 U.S.C.
§§ 2272(a)(2)(A)(iii), 2272(a)(2)(B)(ii).

Section 222(d) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(d), defines the
terms “Supplier” and “Downstream Producer.” For the Department to
issue a secondary worker certification under Section 222(c) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(c), to workers of a Supplier or a Downstream
Producer, the following criteria must be met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) the workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to
a firm that employed a group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), and such supply or production
is related to the article or service that was the basis
for such certification; and

(3) either
(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts
it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or
sales of the workers’ firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm
described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers’ separation or threat of separation.

Workers of a firm may also be considered eligible if they
are publicly identified by name by the International Trade
Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in a category of determination that is listed in
Section 222(f) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(f).
The group eligibility requirements for workers of a firm under
Section 222(f) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(f), can be satisfied if
the following criteria are met:
(1) the workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic
industry in an investigation resulting in--
(A) an affirmative determination of serious injury or
threat thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) an affirmative determination of market disruption
or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) an affirmative final determination of material
injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A)
or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) the petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning
on the date on which--
(A) a summary of the report submitted to the President
by the International Trade Commission under section
202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative
determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section
202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal
Register; and
(3) the workers have become totally or partially
separated from the workers’ firm within--
(A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year
period preceding the 1-year period described in
paragraph (2).

The investigation was initiated in response to a petition
filed on June 23, 2010 on behalf of workers of Humana Insurance
Company, a division of CareNetwork, Inc., Green Bay, Wisconsin.
The workers provide health insurance benefits.
The petitioners alleged that worker separations were due to
a cost reduction initiative by the firm. The investigation
included analysis of data provided by a company official.
With respect to Section 222(a) of the Act, the investigation
revealed that Criterion II has not been met because there have
not been increased imports of health insurance services or a
shift of services to a foreign country by the workers’ firm.
With respect to Section 222(c) of the Act, the investigation
revealed that Criterion (2) has not been met because the firm did
not produce an article or supply a service that was used by a
firm with TAA-certified workers in the production of an article
or supply a service that was the basis for TAA-certification.
Finally, the group eligibility requirements under Section
222(f) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(f), have not been satisfied
because the workers’ firm has not been identified in an affirmative
finding of injury by the International Trade Commission.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that workers of Humana Insurance
Company, a division of CareNetwork, Inc., Green Bay, Wisconsin
are denied eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2273.
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 13th day of August, 2010

/s/ Michael W. Jaffe

______________________________
MICHAEL W. JAFFE
Certifying Officer, Office of
Trade Adjustment Assistance





- 8 -