Denied
« back to search results

TAW-71990  /  United Airlines, Inc. (Flushing, NY)

Petitioner Type: Union
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 08/11/2009
Most Recent Update: 12/04/2009
Determination Date: 12/04/2009
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-71,990

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
LA GUARDIA AIRPORT LINE MAINTENANCE DIVISION
A SUBSIDIARY OF UNITED AIRLINES CORPORATION
FLUSHING, NEW YORK

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended ("Act"), 19 U.S.C. § 2273, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of an investigation regarding
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance.
Workers of a firm may be eligible for worker adjustment
assistance if they satisfy the criteria of subsection (a), (c)
or (f) of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), (c), (f).
For the Department of Labor to issue a certification for workers
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), the
following three criteria must be met:
I. The first criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(1) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2282(a)(1)) requires that a significant
number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm
must have become totally or partially separated or be
threatened with total or partial separation.

II. The second criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(2) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two
ways:
(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the workers' firm
must have decreased absolutely, AND
(ii) (I) imports of articles or services like or directly
competitive with articles or services produced or
supplied by the workers' firm have increased, OR
(II)(aa) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which the
component part produced by the workers' firm was
directly incorporated have increased; OR
(II)(bb) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced
directly using the services supplied by the
workers' firm have increased; OR
(III) imports of articles directly incorporating
component parts not produced in the U.S. that are
like or directly competitive with the article
into which the component part produced by the
workers' firm was directly incorporated have
increased.

(B) Shift in Production or Supply Path:
(i)(I) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a
foreign country in the production of articles or
supply of services like or directly competitive with
those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; OR
(i)(II) there has been an acquisition from a foreign
country by the workers' firm of articles/services that
are like or directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers' firm.

III. The third criterion requires that the increase in imports
or shift/acquisition must have contributed importantly to
the workers' separation or threat of separation. See
Sections 222(a)(2)(A)(iii) and 222(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act,
19 U.S.C. §§ 2272(a)(2)(A)(iii), 2272(a)(2)(B)(ii).

Section 222(d) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(d), defines the
terms "Supplier" and "Downstream Producer." For the Department
to issue a secondary worker certification under Section 222(c)
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(c), to workers of a Supplier or a
Downstream Producer, the following criteria must be met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in
the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm have become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;

(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer
to a firm that employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility under Section
222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), and such
supply or production is related to the article or
service that was the basis for such certification; and

(3) either
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component
parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph
(2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm
described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers' separation or threat of separation.

The investigation was initiated in response to a petition
filed on August 11, 2009, by the International Brotherhood of
Teamsters, Local 986, on behalf of workers United Airlines,
Inc., La Guardia Airport Line Maintenance Division, a
Subsidiary Of United Airlines Corporation, Flushing, New York
(United Airlines). The workers provide line aircraft
maintenance and service for United Airlines Corporation. The
petitioner alleges that aircraft maintenance and service is
being shifted to a foreign country.
With respect to Section 222(a) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that Criteria II.A.ii. and II.B. have
not been met because the subject firm did not import aircraft
maintenance and service, nor did it shift aircraft maintenance
and service to a foreign country during the period under
investigation. Criterion III has not been met because the
workers' separation or threat of separation was not related to
an increase in imports or shift/acquisition in services.
With respect to Section 222(c) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that criteria 2 has not been met because
the workers did not produce an article or supply a service
that was used by a firm with TAA-certified workers in the
production of an article or supply of a service that was the
basis for TAA-certification.
Finally, the group eligibility requirements under Section
222(f) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(f), have not been satisfied
because the workers' firm has not been identified by affirmative
finding of injury by the United States International Trade
Commission.










Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that workers of United Airlines,
Inc., La Guardia Airport Line Maintenance Division, a
Subsidiary Of United Airlines Corporation, Flushing, New York,
who provide aircraft maintenance and service are denied
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2273.


Signed in Washington, D.C., this 4th day of December, 2009.


/s/Elliott S. Kushner
______________________________
ELLIOTT S. KUSHNER
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance