Denied
« back to search results

TAW-71148  /  Avistrap an ITW Company (Lewistown, PA)

Petitioner Type: Company
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 06/11/2009
Most Recent Update: 02/16/2010
Determination Date: 02/16/2010
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-71,148

AVISTRAP AN ITW COMPANY
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS DIVISION
LEWISTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended ("Act"), 19 U.S.C. § 2273, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of an investigation regarding
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance.
Workers of a firm may be eligible for worker adjustment
assistance if they satisfy the criteria of subsection (a), (c)
or (f) of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), (c), (f).
For the Department of Labor to issue a certification for workers
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), the
following three criteria must be met:
I. The first criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(1) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2282(a)(1)) requires that a significant
number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm
must have become totally or partially separated or be
threatened with total or partial separation.

II. The second criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(2) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two
ways:
(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the workers' firm
must have decreased absolutely, AND
(ii) (I) imports of articles or services like or directly
competitive with articles or services produced or
supplied by the workers' firm have increased, OR
(II)(aa) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which the
component part produced by the workers' firm was
directly incorporated have increased; OR
(II)(bb) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced
directly using the services supplied by the
workers' firm have increased; OR
(III) imports of articles directly incorporating
component parts not produced in the U.S. that are
like or directly competitive with the article
into which the component part produced by the
workers' firm was directly incorporated have
increased.

(B) Shift in Production or Supply Path:
(i)(I) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a
foreign country in the production of articles or
supply of services like or directly competitive with
those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; OR
(i)(II) there has been an acquisition from a foreign
country by the workers' firm of articles/services that
are like or directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers' firm.

III. The third criterion requires that the increase in imports
or shift/acquisition must have contributed importantly to
the workers' separation or threat of separation. See
Sections 222(a)(2)(A)(iii) and 222(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act,
19 U.S.C. §§ 2272(a)(2)(A)(iii), 2272(a)(2)(B)(ii).

Section 222(d) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(d), defines the
terms "Supplier" and "Downstream Producer." For the Department
to issue a secondary worker certification under Section 222(c)
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(c), to workers of a Supplier or a
Downstream Producer, the following criteria must be met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in
the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm have become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;

(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer
to a firm that employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility under Section
222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), and such
supply or production is related to the article or
service that was the basis for such certification; and

(3) either
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component
parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph
(2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm
described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers' separation or threat of separation.

The investigation was initiated in response to a petition
filed on June 11, 2009, by a company official on behalf of
workers of Avistrap an ITW Company, Illinois Tool Works
Division, Lewistown, Pennsylvania. The workers produce
polyester and rayon cord strap. The petitioner alleged that
imports of polyester and rayon cord strap as well as the
bankruptcy filing by a TAA-certified customer caused worker
separations.
With respect to Section 222(a) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that criterion II was not met. The
workers' firm did not increase imports of articles like or
directly competitive with the articles produced by the firm in
2007, 2008, or January through June 2009. In addition, there
was not a shift in production to a foreign country by the
workers' firm during the relevant period.
The Department surveyed the firm's major declining
customer regarding purchases of polyester and rayon cord strap
for 2007, 2008, and January through June 2009. The survey
revealed no direct or indirect imports of polyester and rayon
cord strap during the relevant period.
Criterion III was not met because the worker separations
are not attributable to increased imports or a shift in
production to a foreign country by the workers' firm.
With respect to Section 222(c) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that criterion II has not been met. The
firm does not meet the statutory definition of Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm with a TAA-certified worker group.
Specifically, the firm did not produce a component part.
Finally, the group eligibility requirements under Section
222(f) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(f), have not been satisfied
because the workers' firm has not been identified by name in an
affirmative finding of injury by the ITC.







Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that workers of Avistrap an ITW
Company, Illinois Tool Works Division, Lewistown, Pennsylvania
are denied eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2273.
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 16th day of February, 2010


/s/Michael W. Jaffe
______________________________
MICHAEL W. JAFFE
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance