Denied
« back to search results

TAW-70976  /  Job Works Inc. (Fort Wayne, IN)

Petitioner Type: Workers
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 06/04/2009
Most Recent Update: 10/07/2009
Determination Date: 10/07/2009
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-70,976

JOBWORKS INC.
REGION 3
FORT WAYNE, INDIANA

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended ("Act"), 19 U.S.C. § 2273, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of an investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance.
Workers of a firm may be eligible for worker adjustment
assistance if they satisfy the criteria of subsection (a), (c) or
(f) of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), (c), (f).
For the Department of Labor to issue a certification for workers
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), the
following three criteria must be met:
I. The first criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(1) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2282(a)(1)) requires that a significant
number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm
must have become totally or partially separated or be
threatened with total or partial separation.

II. The second criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(2) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two
ways:
(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the workers' firm must
have decreased absolutely, AND
(ii) (I) imports of articles or services like or directly
competitive with articles or services produced or
supplied by the workers' firm have increased, OR
(II)(aa) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which the component
part produced by the workers' firm was directly
incorporated have increased; OR
(II)(bb) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced
directly using the services supplied by the
workers' firm have increased; OR
(III) imports of articles directly incorporating
component parts not produced in the U.S. that are
like or directly competitive with the article into
which the component part produced by the workers'
firm was directly incorporated have increased.

(B) Shift in Production or Supply Path:
(i)(I) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a
foreign country in the production of articles or supply
of services like or directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers' firm; OR
(i)(II) there has been an acquisition from a foreign
country by the workers' firm of articles/services that
are like or directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers' firm.

III. The third criterion requires that the increase in imports or
shift/acquisition must have contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation. See Sections
222(a)(2)(A)(iii) and 222(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act, 19 U.S.C.
§§ 2272(a)(2)(A)(iii), 2272(a)(2)(B)(ii).

Section 222(d) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(d), defines the
terms "Supplier" and "Downstream Producer." For the Department to
issue a secondary worker certification under Section 222(c) of
the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(c), to workers of a Supplier or a
Downstream Producer, the following criteria must be met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in
the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer
to a firm that employed a group of workers who received
a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of
the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that
was the basis for such certification; and

(3) either
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts
it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or
sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm
described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers' separation or threat of separation.

Workers of a firm may also be considered eligible if they
are publicly identified by name by the International Trade
Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in a category of determination that is listed in
Section 222(f) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(f).
The group eligibility requirements for workers of a firm
under Section 222(f) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(f), can be
satisfied if the following criteria are met:
(1) the workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a
domestic industry in an investigation resulting in--
(A) an affirmative determination of serious injury or
threat thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) an affirmative determination of market disruption
or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) an affirmative final determination of material
injury or threat thereof under section
705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and
1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) the petition is filed during the 1-year period
beginning on the date on which--
(A) a summary of the report submitted to the President
by the International Trade Commission under
section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative
determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section
202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative determination described
in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal
Register; and
(3) the workers have become totally or partially
separated from the workers' firm within--
(A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year
period preceding the 1-year period described in
paragraph (2).

The investigation was initiated in response to a petition
filed on June 4, 2009 on behalf of workers of JobWorks Inc.,
Region 3, Fort Wayne, Indiana. The workers are engaged in
providing employment and training services to the unemployed
and youth population. The petitioners alleged a loss of
business as a supplier or downstream producer to a Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) certified firm, which led to
declines in sales/production and to worker separations.
With respect to Section 222(a) of the Act, the investigation
revealed that workers of JobWorks, Inc. who are engaged in
providing employment and training services do not meet the
criteria for certification. Criteria II has not been met
because JobWorks, Inc. did not import, acquire, or shift the
provision of employment and training services in 2007, 2008,
or in January through May 2009. In addition, the Department
of Labor surveyed the major declining customer of JobWorks,
Inc. regarding the provision of employment and training
services during the relevant period. The survey revealed no
imports or acquisition from a foreign country of employment
and training services. Rather, the investigation revealed
that the workers were separated due to a lost contract by the
workers' firm with the firm's primary customer, which awarded
the contract to another domestic firm.
With respect to Section 222(c) of the Act, the investigation
revealed that workers of JobWorks, Inc. who are engaged in the
provision of employment and training services do not meet the
criteria for secondary worker certification. Criterion 2 has
not been met because JobWorks, Inc. is not a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility.
Finally, the group eligibility requirements under Section
222(f) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(f), have not been met because
JobWorks, Inc. has not been identified in an affirmative
finding of injury by the International Trade Commission.



Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that workers of JobWorks Inc., Region
3, Fort Wayne, Indiana who are engaged in the providing
employment and training services are denied eligibility to apply
for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C.
§ 2273.
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 7th day of October, 2009


/s/Michael W. Jaffe
______________________________
MICHAEL W. JAFFE
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance