Denied
« back to search results

TAW-70089  /  Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc. (New Castle, DE)

Petitioner Type: Company
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 05/19/2009
Most Recent Update: 07/24/2009
Determination Date: 07/24/2009
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-70,089

GLENN SPRINGS HOLDINGS, INC.
A SUBSIDIARY OF OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
NEW CASTLE, DELAWARE

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended ("Act"), 19 U.S.C. § 2273, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of an investigation regarding
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance.
Workers of a firm may be eligible for worker adjustment
assistance if they satisfy the criteria of subsection (a), (c)
or (f) of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), (c), (f).
For the Department of Labor to issue a certification for workers
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), the
following three criteria must be met:
I. The first criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(1) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2282(a)(1)) requires that a significant
number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm
must have become totally or partially separated or be
threatened with total or partial separation.

II. The second criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(2) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two
ways:
(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the workers' firm
must have decreased absolutely, AND
(ii) (I) imports of articles or services like or directly
competitive with articles or services produced or
supplied by the workers' firm have increased, OR
(II)(aa) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which the
component part produced by the workers' firm was
directly incorporated have increased; OR
(II)(bb) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced
directly using the services supplied by the
workers' firm have increased; OR
(III) imports of articles directly incorporating
component parts not produced in the U.S. that are
like or directly competitive with the article
into which the component part produced by the
workers' firm was directly incorporated have
increased.

(B) Shift in Production or Supply Path:
(i)(I) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a
foreign country in the production of articles or
supply of services like or directly competitive with
those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; OR
(i)(II) there has been an acquisition from a foreign
country by the workers' firm of articles/services that
are like or directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers' firm.

III. The third criterion requires that the increase in imports
or shift/acquisition must have contributed importantly to
the workers' separation or threat of separation. See
Sections 222(a)(2)(A)(iii) and 222(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act,
19 U.S.C. §§ 2272(a)(2)(A)(iii), 2272(a)(2)(B)(ii).

Section 222(d) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(d), defines the
terms "Supplier" and "Downstream Producer." For the Department
to issue a secondary worker certification under Section 222(c)
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(c), to workers of a Supplier or a
Downstream Producer, the following criteria must be met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in
the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm have become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;

(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer
to a firm that employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility under Section
222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), and such
supply or production is related to the article or
service that was the basis for such certification; and

(3) either
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component
parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph
(2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm
described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers' separation or threat of separation.

The investigation was initiated in response to a petition
filed on May 20, 2009, by a company official on behalf of
workers of Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of
Occidental Petroleum Corporation, New Castle, Delaware (Glenn
Springs Holdings). The workers provided services related to
refining the facility's water, removing sludge from machines,
repairing the building's electrical system, distributing the
remaining anhydrous potassium hydroxide, and closing down the
facility. The petitioner's allegation is that the workers at
the subject facility are eligible to apply for TAA under the
expanded criteria created by the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009, and increased customer imports. The
investigation included examining previous investigations and
determinations, contacting petitioners, and collecting and
analyzing relevant information.
Workers at the subject facility were previously certified
eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance on January 12,
2006, (TA-W-58,508) when they produced anhydrous potassium
hydroxide based on increased company imports. Production at the
subject facility ceased on November 20, 2007. More recently
workers at the subject firm were denied eligibility to apply for
TAA on March 4, 2009, (TA-W-64,851) based on the finding that
the workers did not produce an article.
With respect to Section 222(a) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that criteria (II.A.) was not met
because the subject firm did not import services like or
directly competitive with refining the facility's water,
removing sludge from machines, repairing the building's
electrical system, distributing the remaining anhydrous
potassium hydroxide, and closing the facility. Criteria
(II.B.) was not met because the workers' firm did not shift
services to a foreign country like or directly competitive
with those supplied at Glenn Springs Holdings.
With respect to Section 222(c) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that criteria 2 was not met because the
workers did not supply a service that was used by a firm with
TAA-certified workers in the production of an article or supply
of a service that was a basis for TAA-certification.
Finally, the group eligibility requirements under Section
222(f) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(f), have not been satisfied
because the workers' firm has not been identified in an
affirmative finding of injury by the United States International
Trade Commission.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that workers of Glenn Springs
Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum
Corporation, New Castle, Delaware, who provided services
related to refining the facility's water, removing sludge from
machines, repairing the building's electrical system,
distributing the remaining anhydrous potassium hydroxide, and
closing down the facility are denied eligibility to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. §
2273.


Signed in Washington, D.C., this 24th day of July, 2009.


/s/Linda G. Poole
______________________________
LINDA G. POOLE
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance