DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-70,052
TRANSFREIGHT, LLC
A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF MITSUI & CO., LTD.
PRINCETON, INDIANA

TA-W-70,052A
TRANSFREIGHT, LLC
A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF MITSUI & CO., LTD.
BROWNSTOWN LOGISTICS CENTER
INCLUDING ON-SITE LEASED WORKERS FROM KELLY STAFFING SERVICES
BROWNSTOWN, MICHIGAN

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended ("Act"), 19 U.S.C. § 2273, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of an investigation regarding
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance.
Workers of a firm may be eligible for worker adjustment
assistance if they satisfy the criteria of subsection (a), (c)
or (f) of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), (c), (f).
For the Department of Labor to issue a certification for workers
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), the
following three criteria must be met:
I. The first criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(1) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2282(a)(1)) requires that a significant
number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm
must have become totally or partially separated or be
threatened with total or partial separation.

II. The second criterion (set forth in Section 222(a)(2) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two
ways:
(A) Increased Imports Path:
(i) sales or production, or both, at the workers' firm
must have decreased absolutely, AND
(ii) (I) imports of articles or services like or directly
competitive with articles or services produced or
supplied by the workers' firm have increased, OR
(II)(aa) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which the
component part produced by the workers' firm was
directly incorporated have increased; OR
(II)(bb) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced
directly using the services supplied by the
workers' firm have increased; OR
(III) imports of articles directly incorporating
component parts not produced in the U.S. that are
like or directly competitive with the article
into which the component part produced by the
workers' firm was directly incorporated have
increased.

(B) Shift in Production or Supply Path:
(i)(I) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a
foreign country in the production of articles or
supply of services like or directly competitive with
those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; OR
(i)(II) there has been an acquisition from a foreign
country by the workers' firm of articles/services that
are like or directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers' firm.

III. The third criterion requires that the increase in imports
or shift/acquisition must have contributed importantly to
the workers' separation or threat of separation. See
Sections 222(a)(2)(A)(iii) and 222(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act,
19 U.S.C. §§ 2272(a)(2)(A)(iii), 2272(a)(2)(B)(ii).

Section 222(d) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(d), defines the
terms "Supplier" and "Downstream Producer." For the Department
to issue a secondary worker certification under Section 222(c)
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(c), to workers of a Supplier or a
Downstream Producer, the following criteria must be met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in
the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm have become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;

(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer
to a firm that employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility under Section
222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), and such
supply or production is related to the article or
service that was the basis for such certification; and

(3) either
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component
parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph
(2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm
described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers' separation or threat of separation.

The investigation was initiated in response to a petition
filed on May 19, 2009 by a company official on behalf of
workers of Transfreight, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Mitsui & Co., Ltd., Princeton, Indiana (Transfrieght)(TA-W-
70,052 and Transfreight, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Mitsui & Co., Ltd., Brownstown Logistics Center, Brownstown,
Michigan (Brownstown Logistics Center) (TA-W-70,052A). The
worker group at the Brownstown Logistics Center includes on-
site leased workers from Kelly Staffing Services. The workers
provide transportation, cross-docking, and automobile part
hauling and warehousing. The petitioner alleges that the
subject firm's customer has increased its aggregate imports.
The investigation included a customer survey of the subject
firm's major customer to determine if the customer sourced
transportation services abroad during the 2007, 2008, and
January through April 2009 period over the corresponding 2008
period, nor shift or acquire these services abroad during the
relevant period.
Further investigation revealed that during the relevant
time period, the subject firm was not under the control of the
firm's customer that was surveyed.
With respect to Section 222(a) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that the subject firm did not shift
abroad services related to transportation, cross-docking, and
automobile part warehousing or increase imports of those
services during the relevant time period of the investigation
to a foreign country.
With respect to Section 222(c) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that criterion (2) has not been met
because the workers did not produce an article or supply a
service that was used by a firm with TAA-certified workers in
the production of an article or supply of a service that was
the basis for TAA-certification.
Finally, the group eligibility requirements under Section
222(f) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(f), have not been satisfied
because the subject firm has not been identified in an
affirmative finding of injury by the International Trade
Commission.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that workers of Transfrieght, LLC, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Mitsui & Co., Ltd, Princeton,
Indiana (TA-W-70,052) and Transfreight, LLC, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Mitsui & Co., Ltd., Brownstown Logistics Center,
including on-site leased workers from Kelly Staffing Services,
Brownstown, Michigan (TA-W-70,052A) who provide
transportation, cross-docking, and automobile part hauling and
warehousing services are denied eligibility to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. §
2273.
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 2nd day of December 2009.

/s/ Elliott S. Kushner
______________________________
ELLIOTT S. KUSHNER
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance