Denied
« back to search results

TAW-64076  /  Pearson Education, Inc. (York, PA)

Petitioner Type: Workers
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 09/18/2008
Most Recent Update: 10/20/2008
Determination Date: 10/20/2008
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-64,076

PEARSON EDUCATION INC.
WORKFLOW, TECHNOLOGY & TECH SUPPORT DIVISION
YORK, PENNSYLVANIA

Negative Determinations Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents
the results of an investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group
eligibility requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers
under Section 222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be
satisfied in either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in
such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles produced by such firm or
subdivision have contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the
decline in sales or production of such firm or
subdivision; or



II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in
such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of
the firm, have become totally or partially separated,
or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;

B. there has been a shift in production by such workers'
firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles
like or directly competitive with articles which are
produced by such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free
trade agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African
Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on September 18, 2008 in
response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Pearson
Education Inc., Workflow, Technology & Tech Support Division,
York, Pennsylvania. Workers of the subject facility produce
illustration artwork, media conversion, and animation for
textbooks.
This investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) have not been met.
Pearson Education did not shift production to a foreign
country. The subject firm is undergoing a reorganization of
production operations, and the firm will no longer be
concentrating its efforts on visual assets. Illustration
artwork, media conversion, and animation for textbooks will
either be outsourced to other domestic producers or produced by
the employees working from home.
The subject firm does import specialty products, but these
imports are not like or directly competitive with articles
produced at the York facility, and have not contributed to
separations there.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act
of 1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of its investigation regarding
certification of eligibility to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be
certified eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance
(TAA). Since the workers are denied eligibility to apply for
TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.


Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that all workers of Pearson Education
Inc., Workflow, Technology & Tech Support Division, York,
Pennsylvania, are denied eligibility to apply for adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
also denied eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjust-
ment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 20th day of October 2008

/s/ Richard Church
______________________________
RICHARD CHURCH
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance