Denied
« back to search results

TAW-63227  /  Belden (Leominster, MA)

Petitioner Type: Workers
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 04/21/2008
Most Recent Update: 05/08/2008
Determination Date: 05/08/2008
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-63,227

BELDEN
MOHAWK DIVISION
LEOMINSTER, MASSACHUSETTS

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply For Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on April 21, 2008 in response
to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Belden, Mohawk
Division, Leominster, Massachusetts. The workers produce fiber
optic and copper cables for the telecom industry.
The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.B.) have not been met.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm's sales and
production of fiber optic and copper cables increased in full year
2007 and January through March 2008.
The investigation revealed workers of Mohawk in Manchester,
Connecticut, were certified eligible for Trade Adjustment
Assistance based on a shift of production to Mexico of copper
cable. The copper cable shifted was not like or directly
competitive with the fiber optic and copper cables produced at the
subject facility.
The petitioner alleged the subject firm's shift of production
of copper cables to Mexico affected the subject facility, however
the investigation revealed this shift was not related to products
produced at the subject facility.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the
workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot
be certified eligible for ATAA.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that all workers of Belden, Mohawk
Division, Leominster, Massachusetts, are denied eligibility to
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act
of 1974, and are also denied eligibility to apply for alternative
trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of
1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 8th day of May 2008.

/s/ Linda G. Poole

______________________________
LINDA G. POOLE
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance