Denied
« back to search results

TAW-62389  /  Peer Foods Group, Inc. (Chicago, IL)

Petitioner Type: Workers
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 10/30/2007
Most Recent Update: 12/11/2007
Determination Date: 12/11/2007
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-62,389

PEER FOODS GROUP, INC.
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;



B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on October 30, 2007 in
response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Peer Foods
Group, Inc., Chicago, Illinois. The workers were engaged in
employment related to the production of ham and bacon.
The investigation revealed that criteria (I.C) and (II.B)
have not been met.
The subject firm did not import ham or bacon, nor did it
shift production to a foreign country during the relevant period.
Aggregate united States imports of pork hams and cuts
(cooked and packed), of prepared or preserved pork hams, and of
prepared or preserved pork, all decreased in January through
September 2007 compared with the same period one year earlier.
The investigation further revealed that overall sales of the
subject firm did not decline significantly, and separations at
the Chicago plant are related to plant production being
transferred to another company-owned domestic location.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assis-
tance (ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since
the workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers
cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that all workers of Peer
Foods Group, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, are denied eligibility to
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade
Act of 1974, and are also denied eligibility to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 11th day of December 2007


/s/Richard Church
______________________________
RICHARD CHURCH
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance