Denied
« back to search results

TAW-61730  /  Joy Mining Machinery, Inc. (Franklin, PA)

Petitioner Type: Union
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 06/22/2007
Most Recent Update: 08/28/2007
Determination Date: 08/28/2007
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-61,730

JOY MINING MACHINERY, INC.
FRANKLIN, PENNSYLVANIA

Negative Determinations Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on June 22, 2007 in response
to a petition filed by the IAMAW Union, District 98 on behalf of
workers of Joy Mining Machinery, Inc., Franklin, Pennsylvania. The
workers produce mining machinery.
The investigation revealed that criteria (I.C) and (II.B) have
not been met.
The investigation revealed that there were no company imports
of mining machinery, nor was there a shift in production from the
Franklin, Pennsylvania plant to a foreign country during the period
under investigation.
The petitioners alleged imports from Mexico. The
investigation revealed that company imports were of component parts
not produced in Franklin and were not like or directly competitive
with the final product manufactured there.
A major portion of the sales of the subject firm are for the
export market and thus not affected by imports.
The Department of Labor surveyed major domestic customers of
the subject firm regarding their purchases of mining machinery in
2005, 2006, and January through June, 2007. The survey revealed
declining imports both absolute and relative to purchases from the
subject firm in all periods.
Aggregate United States imports of self-propelled coal or rock
cutters and tunneling machinery from all sources decreased in the
relevant January-May 2007 period compared with the same period in
2006.
Weakness in the United States coal mining industry has led to
reduced sales of mining machinery and worker separations at the
subject firm.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the
workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot
be certified eligible for ATAA.


Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that all workers of Joy
Mining Machinery, Inc., Franklin, Pennsylvania are denied
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of
the Trade Act of 1974, and are also denied eligibility to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 28th day of August, 2007


/s/Richard Church
______________________________
RICHARD CHURCH
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance