Denied
« back to search results

TAW-60822  /  Shiloh Industries (Cleveland, OH)

Petitioner Type: Union
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 01/24/2007
Most Recent Update: 02/14/2007
Determination Date: 02/14/2007
Expiration Date:

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-60,822

SHILOH INDUSTRIES
PARMA, OHIO

Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration


Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for
administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the
Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Shiloh
Industries, Parma, Ohio. The application did not contain new
information supporting a conclusion that the determination was
erroneous, and also did not provide a justification for
reconsideration of the determination that was based on either
mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law.
Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.
TA-W-60,822; Shiloh Industries
Parma, Ohio (May 22, 2007)

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 24th day of May 2007.


/s/ Ralph DiBattista
RALPH DIBATTISTA
Director, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance

4510-FN-P


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-60,822

SHILOH INDUSTRIES
PARMA, OHIO

Negative Determinations Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the results of an
investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance. The group eligibility requirements for directly-
impacted (primary) workers under Section 222(a) the Trade Act of 1974,
as amended, can be satisfied in either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have
become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation
and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or
subdivision; or

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened
to become totally or partially separated;



B. there has been a shift in production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers’ firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers’ firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and
Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with
articles which are or were produced by such firm or
subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on January 24, 2007 in response to
a petition filed on behalf of workers of Shiloh Industries, Parma, Ohio.
The workers produce automotive stampings.
The investigation revealed that criteria I.B and II.B have not been
met.
Sales or production at the subject plant did not decline in the
relevant period.
Production at the Parma plant has not been shifted abroad.
A substantial portion of stampings produced at the subject plant
has been sold abroad. Petitioners allege that these shipments may be
discontinued. Loss of export sales, however, does not constitute
increased imports or a shift of production abroad as required for
certification under the Trade Act.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974
(26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of its investigation regarding certification of eligibility to
apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older
workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the
workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be
certified eligible for ATAA.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the investigation,
I determine that all workers of Shiloh Industries, Parma, Ohio are
denied eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under Section
223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also denied eligibility to apply
for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 14th day of February 2007


/s/Richard Church
______________________________
RICHARD CHURCH
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance