Denied
« back to search results

TAW-60204  /  Schaeffler Group USA (Joplin, MO)

Petitioner Type: Company
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 10/04/2006
Most Recent Update: 10/31/2006
Determination Date: 10/31/2006
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-60,204

SCHAEFFLER GROUP USA
A SUBSIDIARY OF SCHAEFFLER GROUP INCORPORATED
AUTOMOTIVE DIVISION
JOPLIN, MISSOURI

Negative Determinations Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in
such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles produced by such firm or
subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers'
separation or threat of separation and to the decline in
sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on October 4, 2006 in response
to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of
Schaeffler Group USA, A Subsidiary of Schaeffler Group
Incorporated, Automotive Division, Joplin, Missouri. The workers
produced roller bearings for automotive wheel hub and spindle
assemblies.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.B) have not been met.
The subject firm did not import or shift production of
automotive wheel hub and spindle bearing assemblies abroad in 2004,
2005, or during the period of January through September 2006.
The Department of Labor surveyed the subject firm's major
declining customers, regarding their purchases of automotive wheel
hub and spindle bearing assemblies in 2004, 2005, and January
through September 2006 over the corresponding 2005 period. The
survey revealed no imports of like or directly competitive articles
during the relevant period.
Petitioners also filed as adversely affected secondary workers
as suppliers to a firm or subdivision primarily affected by
increased imports or a shift of production abroad.
In order to make an affirmative determination and issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance,
the following group eligibility requirements under Section 222(b)
must be met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) the workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or
downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that
employed a group of workers who received a certification
of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance
benefits and such supply or production is related to the
article that was the basis for such certification; and

(3) either-

(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component
parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described
in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers' firm; or

(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm
(or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers' separation or threat of
separation.

The investigation revealed that criterion (2) has not been
met.
Petitioners allege that job losses were due to their firm
losing business as a supplier to a firm that shifted production
abroad or was affected by increased imports. The investigation
revealed, however, that was not the case.
The Department investigated as to whether the workers of
Schaeffler Group USA, A Subsidiary of Schaeffler Group
Incorporated, Automotive Division, Joplin, Missouri, could be
certified as secondarily affected. The investigation revealed no
trade adjustment assistance certifications have been issued for
workers of the firms for which Schaeffler Group USA supplied
automotive wheel hub and spindle bearing assemblies.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the
workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot
be certified eligible for ATAA.


Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained during this
investigation, I determine that workers of Schaeffler Group USA, A
Subsidiary of Schaeffler Group Incorporated, Automotive Division,
Joplin, Missouri, are denied eligibility to apply for adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also
denied eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 31st day of October 2006



/s/Elliott S. Kushner
______________________________
ELLIOTT S. KUSHNER
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance