Denied
« back to search results

TAW-59732  /  Fibermark (Quakertown, PA)

Petitioner Type: Workers
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 07/17/2006
Most Recent Update: 09/19/2006
Determination Date: 09/19/2006
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


TA-W-59,732

FIBERMARK
DURABLE SPECIALTIES DIVISION
QUAKERTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA


Negative Determinations Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or


II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on July 17, 2006, in response
to a petition filed on behalf of workers FiberMark, Durable
Specialties Division, Quakertown, Pennsylvania. The workers
produce saturated and coated paper.
The investigation revealed that criteria (I.C) and (II.B) have
not been met.
The investigation revealed the subject firm did not import
saturated and coated paper, nor did they transfer production to a
foreign country during the period under investigation.
The Department of Labor normally conducts a customer survey to
determine if imports of products "like or directly" competitive
contributed to layoffs at the subject firm. However, the
Department did not conduct a survey, since there were no declining
customers during the period under investigation.
Furthermore, the investigation revealed a significant shift in
production of saturated and coated paper to an affiliated domestic
facility located in Brownville, New York.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the
workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot
be certified eligible for ATAA.
Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that all workers of
FiberMark, Durable Specialties Division, Quakertown, Pennsylvania
are denied eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also denied
eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D. C. this 19th day of September, 2006.


/s/Elliott S. Kushner
______________________________
ELLIOTT S. KUSHNER
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance