Denied
« back to search results

TAW-59382  /  C.M. Holtzinger Fruit Co. Inc. (Prosser, WA)

Petitioner Type: Workers
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 05/12/2006
Most Recent Update: 06/06/2006
Determination Date: 06/06/2006
Expiration Date:


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-59,382

C.M HOLTZINGER FRUIT CO. LLC.
PROSSER, WASHINGTON

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents
the results of an investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group
eligibility requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers
under Section 222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be
satisfied in either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in
such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of
the firm, have become totally or partially separated,
or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles produced by such firm or
subdivision have contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the
decline in sales or production of such firm or
subdivision; or


II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in
such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of
the firm, have become totally or partially separated,
or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers'
firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles
like or directly competitive with articles which are
produced by such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on May 12, 2006 in response
to a petition filed on behalf of workers at C.M. Holtzinger
Fruit Co. Inc., Prosser, Washington. The investigation revealed
that the official name of the subject firm is C.M. Holtzinger
Fruit Co. LLC., Prosser, Washington. Workers at the subject
firm packaged fruit.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A) have not been met.
The investigation revealed that all workers were separated
from the subject firm more than one year before the date of the
petition. Section 223 (b) of the Act specifies that no
certification may apply to any worker whose last separation
occurred more than one year before the date of the petition.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act
of 1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of its investigation regarding
certification of eligibility to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be
certified eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance
(TAA). Since the workers are denied eligibility to apply for
TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.



Conclusion
After careful review of the facts in this case, I determine
that all workers of C.M. Holtzinger Fruit Co. LLC., Prosser,
Washington, are denied eligibility to apply for adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
also denied eligibility to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under section 246 of the Trade Act of
1974, as amended.

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 6th day of June 2006.


/s/ Linda G. Poole
________________________
LINDA G. POOLE
Certifying Officer,
Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance