Petitioner Type: Workers
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 01/04/2006
Most Recent Update: 01/12/2006
Determination Date: 01/12/2006
Expiration Date:
Employment and Training Administration
TA-W-58,577
DYSTAR LP
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance.
The investigation was initiated on January 4, 2006, in
response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of DyStar LP,
Charlotte, North Carolina. Workers of the subject firm are engaged
in marketing, administration, supply chain management, customer
service, and purchasing in support of textile dye and colorant
production by DyStar LP at foreign locations and unaffiliated
companies.
The investigation revealed that DyStar LP, Charlotte, North
Carolina, does not produce an article within the meaning of Section
222(a)(2) of the Act. In order to be considered eligible to apply
for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of
1974, the worker group seeking certification (or on whose behalf
certification is being sought) must work for a "firm" or
appropriate subdivision that produces an article and there must be
a relationship between the workers' work and the article produced
by the workers' firm or appropriate subdivision. Workers
performing the job functions described above do not support a firm
or appropriate subdivision that produces an article domestically
and thus the worker group can not be considered import impacted or
affected by a shift in production of an article.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the
workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot
be certified eligible for ATAA.
Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that all workers of DyStar
LP, Charlotte, North Carolina are denied eligibility to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974,
and alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 12th day of January 2006
/s/ Elliott S. Kushner
______________________________
ELLIOTT S. KUSHNER
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance