Corrected 1/27/06

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-58,435

PAXAR AMERICAS, INC.
THOMAS AVENUE PLANT
A SUBSIDIARY OF PAXAR CORPORATION
SYSTEMS DIVISION
INCLUDING ON-SITE LEASED WORKERS OF ADECCO
SAYRE, PENNSYLVANIA

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or



II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers’ firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers’ firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers’ firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on December 1, 2005 in
response to a petition filed by International Association of
Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAMAW), Local 2067 on behalf of
workers at Paxar Americas, Inc., Thomas Avenue Plant, a subsidiary
of Paxar Corporation, Systems Division, Sayre, Pennsylvania. The
workers at the subject firm produce electronic imprint machines
(e.g.- label printing machines). The subject firm also leased
workers on-site from Adecco to produce electronic imprint machines.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.B) were not met.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not
import electronic imprint machines, nor did it shift production to
a foreign country during 2003, 2004 or the period of January
through November 2005.
The investigation also revealed that subject firm sales of
electronic imprint machines increased from 2003 to 2004 and again
during the period of January through November 2005 over the
corresponding period in 2004.
The investigation further revealed that employment declines at
the subject firm resulted from the introduction of a like and
directly competitive product line requiring less time to
manufacture and less labor.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the
workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot
be certified eligible for ATAA.





Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained, I determine that
all workers of Paxar Americas, Inc., Thomas Avenue Plant, a
subsidiary of Paxar Corporation, Systems Division, including on-
site leased workers of Adecco, Sayre, Pennsylvania are denied
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of
the Trade Act of 1974, and alternative trade adjustment assistance
under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 28th day of December 2005



______________________________
ELLIOTT S. KUSHNER
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance