Petitioner Type: Company
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 10/26/2005
Most Recent Update: 11/15/2005
Determination Date: 11/15/2005
Expiration Date:
Employment and Training Administration
TA-W-58,213
CELAND YARN DYERS, INC.
THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.B) were not met.
The investigation was initiated on October 26, 2005 in
response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of
workers of Celand Yarn Dyers, Inc., Thomasville, North Carolina.
The workers produce dyed yarn.
Sales, production, and employment at the subject firm will
decline absolutely upon its scheduled shutdown in December of 2005.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not
import dyed yarn, nor did it shift production abroad during the
relevant period.
The petitioners filed as being secondarily affected by
certified trade adjustment assistance firms. The investigation
revealed that only one, representing a very minor portion of the
sales of the subject firm, is currently certified. It increased
purchases from the subject firm in January through October, 2005,
the period when separations at the subject firm occurred or are
seen as imminent, and it did not contribute importantly to
separations at the subject firm.
The Department of Labor surveyed the subject firm's major
customers regarding their purchases of dyed yarn during 2003, 2004,
and January through October 2005. Results of the survey indicated
no imports.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the
workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot
be certified eligible for ATAA.
Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that all workers Celand Yarn
Dyers, Inc., Thomasville, North Carolina are denied eligibility to
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act
of 1974, and are also denied eligibility to apply for alternative
trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the trade Act of
1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 15th day of November, 2005
/s/ Richard Church
______________________________
RICHARD CHURCH
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance