DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
TA-W-57,381

BRODSKY'S UNIFORM AND EQUIPMENT
TACOMA, WASHINGTON

Negative Determinations Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on June 15, 2005 in response
to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Brodsky's Uniform and
Equipment, Tacoma, Washington. The workers at the subject firm are
engaged in activities related to the retail sale of police, fire,
and Postal Service uniforms. Some uniforms are customized by a
tailor on a per order basis.
The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A) I.C and
(a)(2)(B) II.B have not been met.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm has not
shifted production of customized uniforms abroad, nor has it
increased imports of these products.
Furthermore, The Department of Labor surveyed the subject
firm's major customers regarding their purchases of customized
police, fire and postal uniforms. The survey revealed that the
customers did not import products like or directly competitive with
the customized uniforms purchased from the subject firm.


Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that all workers of Brodsky's Uniform
and Equipment, Tacoma, Washington are denied eligibility to apply
for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of
1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 25th day of July 2005
/s/ Richard Church
______________________________
RICHARD CHURCH
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance