Petitioner Type: Company
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 06/03/2005
Most Recent Update: 07/05/2005
Determination Date: 07/05/2005
Expiration Date:
Employment and Training Administration
TA-W-57,313
DORBY FROCKS
WAREHOUSE/DISTRIBUTION
BISHOPVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply For Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance.
The investigation was initiated on June 3, 2005 in response to
a petition filed by the company on behalf of workers of Dorby
Frocks, Warehouse/Distribution, Bishopville, South Carolina. The
workers were engaged in employment related to handling, tagging and
shipping imported products not produced domestically.
The investigation revealed that Dorby Frocks,
Warehouse/Distribution, Bishopville, South Carolina, does not
produce an article within the meaning of Section 222(a)(2) of the
Act. In order to be considered eligible to apply for adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, the worker
group seeking certification (or on whose behalf certification is
being sought) must work for a "firm" or appropriate subdivision
that produces an article and there must be a relationship between
the workers' work and the article produced by the workers' firm or
appropriate subdivision. The workers engaged in handling, tagging
and shipping described above do not support a firm or appropriate
subdivision that produces an article domestically and thus the
worker group can not be considered import impacted or affected by a
shift in production of an article.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the
workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot
be certified eligible for ATAA.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that all workers of Dorby Frocks,
Warehouse/Distribution, Bishopville, South Carolina are denied
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of
the Trade Act of 1974, and are also denied eligibility to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D. C., this 5th day of July 2005
/s/ Richard Church
______________________________
RICHARD CHURCH
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance