Denied
« back to search results

TAW-57125  /  Teleflex Medical (Durham, NC)

Petitioner Type: Company
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 05/06/2005
Most Recent Update: 05/25/2005
Determination Date: 05/25/2005
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-57,125

TELEFLEX MEDICAL
RESEARCVH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA

Negative Determinations Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of
1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of an investigation regarding
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance. The group eligibility requirements for
directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section 222(a)
the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be
satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers
in such workers' firm, or an appropriate
subdivision of the firm, have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles produced by such firm or
subdivision have contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or
subdivision; or

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be
satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers
in such workers' firm, or an appropriate
subdivision of the firm, have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such
workers' firm or subdivision to a foreign country
of articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has
shifted production of the articles is a party
to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has
shifted production of the articles is a
beneficiary country under the Andean Trade
Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity
Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase
in imports of articles that are like or
directly competitive with articles which are or
were produced by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on May 6, 2005 in
response to a petition filed by a company official on
behalf of workers of Teleflex Medical, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina. The workers produce medical devices.
The investigation revealed that criteria I.A. and
II.A. have not been met.
The investigation revealed that employment at the subject
facility increased strongly in both 2004 and in the first four
months of 2005. The size of the workforce at Teleflex has not yet
been adversely affected by an anticipated production shift
indicated by the petitioner.
The petitioner is encouraged to re-apply when worker
separations and a shift of production abroad are manifested
in the company data supplied to the Department of Labor.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade
Act of 1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of
Labor herein presents the results of its investigation
regarding certification of eligibility to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older
workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification
of eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be
certified eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance
(TAA). Since the workers are denied eligibility to apply
for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.


Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the
investigation, I determine that all workers of Teleflex
Medical, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina are denied
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also denied
eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 25th day of May 2005

/s/ Richard Church
_____________________________
RICHARD CHURCH
Certifying Officer, Division
Trade Adjustment Assistance