Petitioner Type: Company
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 02/01/2005
Most Recent Update: 03/01/2005
Determination Date: 03/01/2005
Expiration Date:
Employment and Training Administration
TA-W-56,451
ALLOY ENGINEERING AND CASTING COMPANY
COUNTER GRAVITY CASTING DIVISION
CHAMPAIGN, ILLINOIS
Negative Determinations Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.
The investigation was initiated on February 1, 2005 in
response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of
workers of Alloy Engineering and Casting Company, Counter Gravity
Casting Division, Champaign, Illinois. The workers produce
stainless steel exhaust manifold castings.
The investigation revealed that Criteria (a) (2) (A) (I.C) and
(a)(2)(B) (II.B) were not met.
The subject firm did not import stainless steel exhaust
manifold castings, nor did it shift production abroad.
The Department of Labor surveyed firms to which the subject
firm submitted bids to supply stainless steel exhaust manifold
castings in 2004 and 2005. The surveys revealed either that the
bids lost were not large enough to have contributed importantly
to declines in sales, production, and employment at the subject
firm, or that any imports from production abroad by the winning
bidder would not arrive for several years, or that the subject
firm was not the lowest domestic bidder for the contract.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assis-
tance (ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since
the workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers
cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that all workers of Alloy
Engineering and Casting Company, Counter Gravity Casting
Division, Champaign, Illinois are denied eligibility to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974,
and are also denied eligibility to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 1st day of March, 2005.
/s/ Richard Church
______________________________
RICHARD CHURCH
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance