Denied
« back to search results

TAW-56355A  /  Graham Steel Corp. (Kirkland, WA)

Petitioner Type: Workers
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 01/19/2005
Most Recent Update: 03/01/2005
Determination Date: 03/01/2005
Expiration Date:

Other Worker Groups on This Petition
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-56,355

GRAHAM STEEL CORPORATION
REINFORCING STEEL DIVISION
KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON

TA-W-56,355A

GRAHAM STEEL CORPORATION
STRUCTURAL STEEL DIVISION
KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or



II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on January 19, 2005 in
response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Graham Steel
Corporation, Reinforcing Steel Division, Kirkland, Washington (TA-
W-56,333) and Structural Steel Division, Kirkland, Washington (TA-
W-56,333A).
The workers at the Reinforcing Steel Division (TA-W-56,333)
produced reinforcing (rebar) steel. The workers at the Structural
Steel Division (TA-W-56,333A) produced structural steel.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.B) were not met.
The investigation revealed that the Reinforcing Steel Division
(TA-W-56,333) did not import reinforcing steel during 2003 and
2004, and the Structural Steel Division (TA-W-56,333A) did not
import structural steel during 2003 or 2004, nor did they shift
production to a foreign country during the relevant period.
The Department of Labor surveyed the Reinforcing Steel
Division's (TA-W-56,333) and the Structural Steel Division's (TA-W-
56,333A) major declining customers regarding their purchases of
reinforcing steel and structural steel, respectively. The survey
revealed that imports did not contribute importantly to the
separation of workers at the subject divisions during the period
under investigation.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the
workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot
be certified eligible for ATAA.





Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained, I determine that
all workers of Graham Steel Corporation, Reinforcing Steel
Division, Kirkland, Washington and Structural Steel Division,
Kirkland, Washington are denied eligibility to apply for adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 1st day of March 2005


/s/ Elliott S. Kushner
______________________________
ELLIOTT S. KUSHNER
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance