Denied
« back to search results

TAW-55741  /  Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. (Milford, CT)

Petitioner Type: Unknown
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 10/05/2004
Most Recent Update: 11/09/2004
Determination Date: 11/09/2004
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-55,741

JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION
CORRUGATED CONTAINER DIVISION
A SUBSIDIARY OF SMURFIT STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION
MILFORD, CONNECTICUT

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or



II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on October 5, 2004 in response
to a petition filed by a representative of the Paper, Allied-
Industrial, Chemical & Energy Workers International Union, Local 1-
745 on behalf of workers of Jefferson Smurfit Corporation,
Corrugated Container Division, a subsidiary of Smurfit Stone
Container Corporation, Milford, Connecticut. Workers of the
subject facility produce corrugated paper boxes, and are not
separately identifiable by product.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.B) were not met.
The subject firm did not import corrugated paper boxes, or
shift production to any foreign country during 2002, 2003, or
January through August of 2004.
The investigation revealed that production at the subject
facility was shifted to other domestic facilities.
Furthermore, the Department of Labor surveyed the subject
facility's major declining customers regarding their purchases of
corrugated paper boxes in the above periods. The survey revealed
no imports during the relevant period.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the
workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot
be certified eligible for ATAA.


Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that all workers of
Jefferson Smurfit Corporation, Corrugated Container Division, a
subsidiary of Smurfit Stone Container Corporation, Milford,
Connecticut are denied eligibility to apply for adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 9th day of November 2004.

/s/ Linda G. Poole
______________________________
LINDA G. POOLE
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance