Denied
« back to search results

TAW-54680  /  Grand Valley Manufacturing (Titusville, PA)

Petitioner Type: Workers
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 04/07/2004
Most Recent Update: 05/24/2004
Determination Date: 05/24/2004
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-54,680

GRAND VALLEY MANUFACTURING
TITUSVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA

Negative Determinations Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on April 7, 2004 in response
to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Grand Valley
Manufacturing, Titusville, Pennsylvania. The workers produced
machined parts.
The investigation revealed that I.C. and II.B. have not been
met.
The subject firm did not import machined parts, nor did it
shift production abroad in the relevant period.
The Department of Labor conducted a survey of the major
customer of the subject firm regarding its purchases of Holstein
rods and barrels in 2002, 2003 and January-March 2004. The survey
revealed that the respondent did not import in the above period.
The Department conducted a bid survey of awards lost by the
subject firm in the relevant period. The survey revealed that none
of the bids was awarded to foreign manufacturers.
Petitioners also filed as adversely affected secondary workers
as suppliers, assemblers or finishers to a firm or subdivision
primarily affected by increased imports or a shift of production
abroad.
In order to make an affirmative determination and issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance,
the following group eligibility requirements under Section 222(b)
must be met:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) the workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or
downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that
employed a group of workers who received a certification
of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance
benefits and such supply or production is related to the
article that was the basis for such certification; and

(3) either-

(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component
parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described
in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers' firm; or

(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm
(or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers' separation or threat of
separation.

The investigation revealed that criterion (3)(B) has not
been met.
Petitioners allege that job losses were due to their firm
losing business as a supplier, assembler or finisher to a firm
that shifted production abroad or was affected by increased
imports. The investigation revealed, however, that was not the
case.
Loss of business by the subject firm with the trade affected
firms whose workers were under active certification was minimal
in the relevant period prior to the petition date and did not
contribute importantly to separation of workers at the subject
firm.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assis-
tance (ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since
the workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers
cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.


Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that all workers of Grand
Valley Manufacturing, Titusville, Pennsylvania are denied
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223
of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also denied eligibility to
apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section
246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 24th day of May 2004.

/s/ Richard Church
______________________________
RICHARD CHURCH
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance