Denied
« back to search results

TAW-54200  /  Sanmina-SCI Corp. (Richardson, TX)

Petitioner Type: Union
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 02/09/2004
Most Recent Update: 03/19/2004
Determination Date: 03/19/2004
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-54,200

SANMINA-SCI
RICHARDSON, TEXAS

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or



II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on February 9, 2004 in
response to a petition filed by a union official on behalf of
workers at Sanmina-SCI, Richardson, Texas. The workers at the
subject firm produced telecommunications equipment.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.B) were not met.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not
import telecommunications equipment during 2002 or 2003, nor did it
shift production abroad during the relevant period.
The Department of Labor surveyed the subject firm's major
customer regarding its purchases of telecommunications equipment.
The survey revealed no imports of telecommunications equipment
during the period under investigation.
Petitioners also filed as adversely affected secondary workers
both as suppliers to a firm or subdivision primarily affected by
increased imports or a shift of production abroad, and as
assemblers/finishers of products made by a trade affected company.
The investigation revealed, however, that was not the case.
The subject firm did not supply a component to a primary firm
whose workers have been certified as trade impacted. The
telecommunications equipment produced by the subject firm was not a
component of the product (printed circuit boards) that was the
basis of the certification of workers at the firm cited on the
petition, Alcatel USA, Plano, Texas, nor did workers at the subject
firm assemble or finish the printed circuit boards manufactured by
the cited Alcatel division.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the
workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot
be certified eligible for ATAA.



Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in this
investigation, I determine that all workers of Sanmina-SCI,
Richardson, Texas are denied eligibility to apply for adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also
denied eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 19th day of March 2004.

/s/ Richard Church
______________________________
RICHARD CHURCH
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance