Petitioner Type: Company
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 12/18/2003
Most Recent Update: 01/23/2004
Determination Date: 01/23/2004
Expiration Date:
Employment and Training Administration
TA-W-53,838
WAH CHANG
A SUBSIDIARY OF ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
ALBANY, OREGON
Negative Determinations Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.
by such firm or subdivision.
The investigation was initiated on December 18, 2003 in
response to a petition filed by a State agency representative on
behalf of workers of Wah Chang, a subsidiary of Allegheny
Technologies, Inc., Albany, Oregon. The workers of the subject firm
produce metals. Workers are not separately identifiable by product
line.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a) (2) (A) (I.A),
(a) (2) (A) (I.B), and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) were not met.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not
separate or threaten to separate a significant number or proportion
of workers as required by Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Significant number or proportion of the workers means that total or
partial separations, or both, in a firm or appropriate subdivision
thereof, are the equivalent to a total unemployment of five percent
(5 percent) of the workers or 50 workers, whichever is less.
Separations by the subject firm did not meet this threshold level.
Furthermore, the investigation revealed that sales and
production of metals by the subject group increased from 2001 to
2002, and from 2002 to 2003.
Moreover, the subject group did not shift production of metals
to a foreign country during the relevant period.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since the
workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot
be certified eligible for ATAA.
Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that all workers of Wah
Chang, a subsidiary of Allegheny Technologies, Inc., Albany, Oregon
are denied eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also denied
eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance
under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 23rd day of January, 2004.
/s/ Linda G. Poole
_______________________________
LINDA G. POOLE
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance