DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
TA-W-52,598
MINACS
FLINT, MICHIGAN

AND

TA-W-52,598A
MINACS
SWARTZ CREEK, MICHIGAN

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply For Worker Adjustment Assistance
And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents
the results of an investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance.
The investigation was initiated in response to a petition
received on August 18, 2003 and filed by a company official on
behalf of workers at Minacs, Flint, Michigan and Swartz Creek,
Michigan. The workers are engaged in call center functions
(supply information) via telephone, e-mail or fax for automobile
customers.
The investigation revealed that the petitioning workers of
this firm or subdivision do not produce an article within the
meaning of Section 222(c)(3) of the Act. The Department of Labor
has consistently determined that the performance of services does
not constitute production of an article, as required by Section
222 of the Trade Act of 1974, and this determination has been
upheld in the U.S. Court of Appeals.
Workers at that firm or subdivision may be certified only if
their separation was caused importantly by a reduced demand for
their services from a parent firm, a firm otherwise related to
their firm by ownership, or a firm related by control. Addition-
ally, the reduction in demand for services must originate at a
production facility whose workers independently meet the
statutory criteria for certification, and the reduction must
directly relate to the product impacted by imports. These
conditions have not been met for workers at this firm.
In addition, in accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of
1974 (26 USC 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein
presents the results of its investigation regarding certification
of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assis-
tance (ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of
eligibility to apply for ATAA, the worker group must be certified
eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance (TAA). Since
the workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers
cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.





Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that all workers of
Minacs, Flint, Michigan (TA-W-52,598) and Minacs, Swartz Creek,
Michigan (TA-W-52,598A) are denied eligibility to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974,
as amended.
I further determine that all workers of Minacs, Flint,
Michigan (TA-W-52,598) and Minacs, Swartz Creek, Michigan (TA-W-
52,598A) are denied eligibility to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D. C. this 22nd day of August 2003.

/s/ Elliott S. Kushner

___________________________
ELLIOTT S. KUSHNER
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance