Denied
« back to search results

TAW-52434  /  De La Rue Cash Systems (Watertown, WI)

Petitioner Type: Company
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 07/31/2003
Most Recent Update: 08/22/2003
Determination Date: 08/22/2003
Expiration Date:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-52,434

DE LA RUE CASH SYSTEMS
CASH SYSTEMS DIVISION
WATERTOWN, WISCONSIN

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents
the results of an investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group
eligibility requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers
under Section 222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be
satisfied in either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in
such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of
the firm, have become totally or partially separated,
or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles produced by such firm or
subdivision have contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the
decline in sales or production of such firm or
subdivision; or





II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in
such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of
the firm, have become totally or partially separated,
or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers'
firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles
like or directly competitive with articles which are
produced by such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on July 31, 2003 in
response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of
workers at De La Rue Systems, Cash Systems Division, Watertown,
Wisconsin. The workers produced teller cash dispensers.
The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(I)(B) has not
been met.
The investigation revealed the sales and production did not
decline from 2001 through 2002 and also did not decline from
January through June 2003 when compared to the same time period
in 2002.
The investigation revealed that there were no imports of
products that were like or directly competitive to the products
produce at the subject firm.
Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that all workers of De La
Rue Systems, Cash Systems Division, Watertown, Wisconsin, are
denied eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 22nd day of August 2003.

/s/ Linda G. Poole

______________________________
LINDA G. POOLE
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance