DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-52,297

INTERMET
RADFORD FOUNDRY
RADFORD, VIRGINIA

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, can be satisfied in either of two
ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on July 14, 2003 in response
to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of
Intermet, Radford Foundry, Radford, Virginia. The workers are
engaged in producing camshafts and reaction shafts. The
investigation revealed that criteria I.C. and II.B. have not been
met.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not
import camshafts or reaction shafts, nor did they shift production
abroad during the relevant period.
The U.S. Department of Labor conducted a survey of the major
customers of the subject firm regarding their purchases of
camshafts and reaction shafts during 2001, 2002 and January through
July 2003 over the corresponding 2002 period. The survey revealed
no imports during the relevant period.



Conclusion
After careful review, I conclude that all workers of
Intermet, Radford Foundry, Radford, Virginia are denied
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223
of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed in Washington, D.C., this 12th day of August 2003.

/s/ Elliott S. Kushner
________________________________
ELLIOTT S. KUSHNER
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance