DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-52,215

COOPER B-LINE
PORTLAND, OREGON

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or



II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on July 2, 2003 in response to
a petition filed on behalf of workers of Cooper B-Line, Portland,
Oregon. The workers produce meter mounting electrical enclosures.
The investigation revealed that criteria I.C and II.B. have
not been met.
The subject firm has not increased its imports of the products
it manufactures at the subject plant, nor has it transferred
production abroad.
Petitioners allege that separations at the Portland plant were
caused by losing business as a supplier to a trade-affected
company. The investigation revealed that was not the case.
Sales and production levels did not decline significantly
during the relevant period, actually increasing in the most recent
period. Separations at the subject facility are related to the
firm's shift in production to other domestic locations.
Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that all workers of Cooper
B-Line Systems, Portland, Oregon are denied eligibility to apply
for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of
1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 7th day of August 2003.

/s/Richard Church
______________________________
Richard Church
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance