DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-52,143

LARIMER AND NORTON, INC.
GALETON, PENNSYLVANIA

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents the
results of an investigation regarding certification of eligibility
to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group eligibility
requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers under Section
222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive
with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
contributed importantly to such workers' separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision; or

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which are produced by
such firm or subdivision; and

C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on June 26, 2003 in response
to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of
Larimer and Norton, Inc., Galeton, Pennsylvania. Workers produce
wood dimension products.
The investigation revealed that criteria I.C. and II.B. have
not been met.
The investigation revealed that the subject company did not
shift production abroad.
The investigation also revealed that the subject company did
not have any import purchases of wood dimension products during
the relevant time periods.
The Department of Labor conducted a survey of the subject
company's major customers regarding their purchases of wood
dimension products during 2001, 2002, January-June 2002, and
January-June 2003. The survey revealed no increased customer
import purchases during the relevant time periods.


Petitioners allege that job losses were due to their firm
losing business as a supplier to a firm that shifted production
abroad or was affected by increased imports. The investigation
revealed, however, that was not the case. The subject firm did
not supply a component to a firm whose workers have been
certified as trade impacted.
Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that all workers of Larimer
and Norton, Inc., Galeton, Pennsylvania are denied eligibility
to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed in Washington, D. C. this 30th day of July 2003.

/s/ Richard Church
_______________________________
RICHARD CHURCH
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance