Petitioner Type: Company
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 05/01/2003
Most Recent Update: 06/10/2003
Determination Date: 06/10/2003
Expiration Date:
Employment and Training Administration
TA-W-51,660
LEONARD KUNKIN ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOUDERTON, PENNSYLVANIA
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents
the results of an investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group
eligibility requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers
under Section 222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in
such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of
the firm, have become totally or partially separated,
or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles produced by such firm or
subdivision have contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the
decline in sales or production of such firm or
subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in
such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of
the firm, have become totally or partially separated,
or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers'
firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles
like or directly competitive with articles which are
produced by such firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth
and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.
The investigation was initiated on May 1, 2003 in response
to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of the
workers of Leonard Kunkin Associates, Inc., Souderton,
Pennsylvania. The workers at the subject firm produce fabricated
structural steel.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.B) have not been met.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not
import fabricated structural steel, or shift production of
fabricated structural steel to a foreign country during 2001,
2002, or January through March of 2003.
Furthermore, the Department of Labor surveyed the entities
to which the subject firm submitted bids during the relevant
period. The survey revealed that none of the contracts were
awarded to a foreign firm in which Leonard Kunkin Associates,
Inc., Souderton, Pennsylvania was the lowest domestic bidder.
All of the contracts were awarded to other domestic firms.
Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that workers at Leonard
Kunkin Associates, Inc., Souderton, Pennsylvania, are denied
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223
of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 10th day of June, 2003.
/s/ Linda G. Poole
______________________________
LINDA G. POOLE
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance