Denied
« back to search results

TAW-50745  /  Monaco Coach Corporation (Bend, OR)

Petitioner Type: State
Impact Date:
Filed Date: 01/30/2003
Most Recent Update: 03/03/2003
Determination Date: 03/03/2003
Expiration Date:


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-50,745

MONACO COACH CORPORATION
BEND, OREGON

Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents
the results of an investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance. The group
eligibility requirements for directly-impacted (primary) workers
under Section 222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be
satisfied in either of two ways:
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in
such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the
firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or
subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles produced by such firm or
subdivision have contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the
decline in sales or production of such firm or
subdivision; or



II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:

A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers'
firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like
or directly competitive with articles which are produced
by such firm or subdivision; and
C.One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a party to a free
trade agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted
production of the articles is a beneficiary country
under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African
Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in
imports of articles that are like or directly
competitive with articles which are or were produced
by such firm or subdivision.

The investigation was initiated on January 30, 2003 in
response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Monaco
Coach Corporation, Bend, Oregon. The workers produce motor
coaches (recreational vehicles).
The investigation revealed that criteria (I.C.) and (II.B.)
have not been met.
The Department of Labor surveyed major customers regarding
their purchases of motor coaches. Respondents reported they did
not import in the relevant periods.
The subject firm did not shift production abroad during the
relevant period.



Conclusion
After careful review, I determine that all workers of
Monaco Coach Corporation, Bend, Oregon are denied eligibility to
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed in Washington, D.C. this 3rd day of March 2003


/s/ Richard Church
______________________________
RICHARD CHURCH
Certifying Officer, Division of
Trade Adjustment Assistance