Employment and Training Administration Advisory System U.S. Department of Labor
Washington, D.C. 20210 |
CLASSIFICATION
UI CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL OWS/DPM DATE July 2, 2003 |
ADVISORY: | UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM LETTER No.28-03 |
TO: | ALL STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES |
FROM: | CHERYL ATKINSON /s/ Administrator Office of Workforce Security | |
SUBJECT: | Call Memo for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 Unemployment Insurance (UI) State Quality Service Plan (SQSP) |
RESCISSIONS | EXPIRATION DATE |
None | September 30, 2004 |
4. Federal Emphasis. Each year, the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) identifies program areas that warrant additional attention. The five-year Department of Labor (DOL) and ETA Strategic Plan, as well as the DOL and ETA Annual Performance Plans (APPs), form the basis for the Federal emphasis for FY 2004. Required by Congress under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), the Strategic Plan and APPs are an integral part of the budget process. Both are outcome-driven and require a commitment from all DOL programs to attain expressed goals and outcomes.
The UI program's goal, shown below, supports the DOL strategic goal of "A Secure Workforce."
Make timely and accurate benefit payments to unemployed workers, facilitate the reemployment of unemployment insurance claimants, and set up unemployment tax accounts promptly for new employers.
Achieving these outcomes requires the combined efforts of the federal and state partners. States whose performance is below these goals are encouraged to develop performance plans cooperatively with their respective ETA Regional Office (RO).
5. Corrective Action Plans (CAPs)/Continuous Improvement Plans (CIPs). The underlying strategic approach of UI Performs is to:
raise the performance of states where performance is below minimum criteria; develop and implement processes and systems which support continuous improvement above such minimum performance levels; and
States are reminded that the SQSP design not only permits but encourages the
development of multi-year CAPs and CIPs so that efforts which, due to their
size, scope or complexity must extend beyond a fiscal year, can be realistically
portrayed. Out-year portions of such multi-year plans need not provide quarterly
targets or milestones as are required for the SQSP year but should provide sufficient
information so that the anticipated progression of activity and results is clearly
understood.
6. Performance Criteria for FY 2004. ETA, in conjunction with states and the National Association of State Workforce Agencies, is currently engaged in a comprehensive review of UI PERFORMS. The review will examine the performance measures, established criteria and the effectiveness of UI PERFORMS. (See UIPL 06-03.) Performance measures and criteria will remain at the FY 2003 levels pending the outcome of the review; however, states are encouraged to maintain their efforts to improve performance. The attached table displays the current Tier 1 measures and criteria.
7. Special Planning Requirements for FY 2004.
8. Targeted Funding and Special Planning Considerations for FY 2004. Funds are included in the President’s budget request for Remote UI Access Grants. The budget request contains $9 million for grants that promote access to the UI system by telephone, Internet, or other remote means. Special instructions for these targeted funds will be issued in separate advisories.
9. Funding Period. The proposed appropriation language
provides for obligation of FY 2004 UI
allocations by states through December 31, 2004 (with 90 additional days to
complete expenditure of funds). However, states may obligate FY 2004 UI funds
through September 30, 2006, if such obligations are for automation acquisitions.
Therefore, the end of the FY 2004 funding period is December 31, 2004, for UI
regular allocations, and September 30, 2006, for automation acquisitions.
10. Data Availability. The ROs will provide states with data reports to judge performance against the Tier I and Tier II measures and the GPRA goals. States may also access performance data on the Internet at https://ows.doleta.govhttps://ows.doleta.gov.
11. Deadline for State SQSP Submittal. Each RO will set a deadline for states to submit their SQSPs for FY 2004. The deadline shall balances the time needed for the states to prepare their respective SQSPs and the time needed for the RO review.
12. Electronic Submission of the SQSP. States
are encouraged to submit the SQSP electronically but should contact the RO SQSP
Coordinator prior to submittal to identify and coordinate specific details.
Generally, plans may be submitted in MS Word 2000 or an earlier version. Standard
forms required as part of the budget reporting process (Chapter II of ET Handbook
336) are available in PDF format and may be downloaded from the Office of Management
and Budget website at www.omb.govwww.omb.gov. If electronic
signatures are approved by the state for use in the submission of legal documents
to the National Office and ROs, states may submit the SQSP signature page electronically.
States that do not submit an electronic signature page must submit the signature
page in hard copy by mail or facsimile by the deadline set by the RO.
13. Action Required. State Administrators are requested to:
14. Inquiries.Questions should be directed to the appropriate RO.
15. Attachments.
Tier I Measures Criterion Table
The revised UI-1 budget form and instructions
for the UI-1.