Guidance Search
The Department of Labor provides this guidance search tool as a single, searchable location where users may search for guidance issued by any of the Department’s agencies, including significant guidance documents under Executive Order 12866. Individual guidance documents are maintained on the various agency websites, and if you know what agency you are looking for, you may also find guidance by navigating directly to that agency’s website. The Code of Federal Regulations and the Federal Register, which are not maintained by the Department, also include some of the Department’s interpretations of law and similar material.
OMB’s Final Bulletin for Agency Good Guidance Practices establishes policies and procedures for the development, issuance, and use of significant guidance documents by Executive Branch departments, including requiring that agencies enable the public to request that significant guidance documents be created, reconsidered, modified or rescinded. To petition for a significant guidance document to be created, modified, reconsidered, or rescinded, email the Department of Labor. Petitions should identify the specific guidance document by name and include your reason(s) for the request.
On January 20, 2021, President Biden issued the “Executive Order on Revocation of Certain Executive Orders Concerning Federal Regulation.” In response, the Department issued a final rule January 27, 2021 to rescind its August 28, 2020 rule on guidance documents.
Search Tips
- If you are searching using an acronym, try a second search with the acronym spelled out. For example, if you are searching for guidance related to the Davis-Bacon Act, try searching "Davis-Bacon Act" as well as "DBA".
- For more specific results, use quotation marks around phrases.
- For more general results, remove quotation marks to search for each word individually. For example, minimum wage will return all documents that have either the word minimum or the word wage in the description, while “minimum wage” will limit results to those containing that phrase.
Whether the Detroit/Wayne County Port Authority’s "cafeteria" plan covering only Authority employees, which may, under certain options, include its employees in a larger group in order to obtain favorable group insurance rates, is a governmental plan.
Utilization of a Stop Time Measuring Instrument for Verification of Compliance With 29 CFR 1910.217. - [1910.217]
Whether under section 406 of ERISA (Company) and other members of its controlled group may retain (Bank) as trustee of various employee benefit plans which (Company) or any member of its controlled group maintain, or in the future may maintain, and that (Bank) may be paid reasonable compensation for trustee service performed. Whether plan assets may be invested in (Bank's) commingled short-term investment fund without engaging in a prohibited transaction under section 406 of ERISA.
Bonuses under the plans will be distributed in terms of "cents per hour" (bonus wages rate) and will be based on actual hours worked. The payment will be adjusted for overtime hours. Section 7(e)
Whether employers adopting SEP arrangements with Foothill Thrift, an industrial loan company, would not be precluded from using the alternative method of compliance prescribed in 29 CFR §2520.104-49 by reason of certain limitations on the withdrawal of funds by participants exercisable by Foothill Thrift. Whether the limitations on withdrawal provisions of Foothill Thrift's IRA investment certificates, which could possibly affect withdrawals of contributions under a SEP arrangement, are deemed to be "provisions that prohibit the withdrawal of funds by participants" within the meaning of such phrase as it is used in §2520.104-49.
Whether the Ford Motor Company’s Salaried Income Security Plan is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) of ERISA and not an employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(2) of ERISA.
Whether the Chiropractic Health Plan Trust is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) of ERISA. Whether the state chiropractic associations would be "employers" within the meaning of section 3(5) of ERISA in relation to a program of benefits which are among those identified in section 3(1) of ERISA and which is offered to the members of these chiropractic associations?
Whether a pension plan established and maintained by Blind Industries and Services of Maryland (BISM) only for its employees and a plan maintained both by BISM for its employees and by the Maryland Vending Facilities Program, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (DVR), a division of the Maryland Department of Education, for former BISM employees now employed by DVR are governmental plans excluded from coverage by title I of ERISA.
Whether the Eastern Small Business Federation Group Trust is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) of ERISA and is covered by title I of ERISA. Whether section 514 of ERISA preempts the provisions of Chapter 676 of the Connecticut General Laws (Conn. Chap. 676) from applying to the Trust.
Whether the proposed wage continuation plans of International Metals & Machines, Inc. and certain of its affiliates constitute a payroll practice within the meaning of 29 C.F.R. §2510.3-1(b)(2) rather than an employee welfare benefit plan described in ERISA section 3(1) and, thus, excluded from ERISA title I coverage.
This button allows you to download all records in the database as of 1:00 am ET today into a CSV file. Please note that record changes made today will not be reflected until tomorrow.