Guidance Search
The Department of Labor provides this guidance search tool as a single, searchable location where users may search for guidance issued by any of the Department’s agencies, including significant guidance documents under Executive Order 12866. Individual guidance documents are maintained on the various agency websites, and if you know what agency you are looking for, you may also find guidance by navigating directly to that agency’s website. The Code of Federal Regulations and the Federal Register, which are not maintained by the Department, also include some of the Department’s interpretations of law and similar material.
OMB’s Final Bulletin for Agency Good Guidance Practices establishes policies and procedures for the development, issuance, and use of significant guidance documents by Executive Branch departments, including requiring that agencies enable the public to request that significant guidance documents be created, reconsidered, modified or rescinded. To petition for a significant guidance document to be created, modified, reconsidered, or rescinded, email the Department of Labor. Petitions should identify the specific guidance document by name and include your reason(s) for the request.
On January 20, 2021, President Biden issued the “Executive Order on Revocation of Certain Executive Orders Concerning Federal Regulation.” In response, the Department issued a final rule January 27, 2021 to rescind its August 28, 2020 rule on guidance documents.
Search Tips
- If you are searching using an acronym, try a second search with the acronym spelled out. For example, if you are searching for guidance related to the Davis-Bacon Act, try searching "Davis-Bacon Act" as well as "DBA".
- For more specific results, use quotation marks around phrases.
- For more general results, remove quotation marks to search for each word individually. For example, minimum wage will return all documents that have either the word minimum or the word wage in the description, while “minimum wage” will limit results to those containing that phrase.
Whether the Forest Oil Corporation and Forest Oil of Canada, Ltd. Division Overriding Royalty Bonus Plan is an employee benefit plan within the meaning of ERISA section 3(3) and thus is covered by ERISA title I.
The letter addresses whether a patient is an employee under the FLSA. The letter concludes that "the fact that a physican has recommended work therapy for an individual patient has no bearing on the determination of an employment relationship."
Requirements for back up alarms. - [1926.601(b)(4); 1926.602(a)(9)(ii)]
Concerning if minimum wage applies to Domestic Service employees; full time child care providers
Whether the Massachusetts Laborers Health and Welfare Fund, the Rhode Island Laborers Health and Welfare Heavy Construction Trust Fund, the Rhode Island Laborers Health and Welfare Fund, and the Broward County Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund (hereinafter referred to as the Plans) are covered by ERISA.
The application of the short test for exemption in section 541.(f) in light of the ruling of the Third Circuit in Marshall v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 24 WH Cases 704 (C.A. 3, 1980).
Employer sponsors a savings plan, open to all employees. Bona fide 7(e)(3) savings plan receive formal approval from the Administrator, provided the statutory and regulatory criteria are met, for employer contributions to be excluded from the regular rate of pay.
The ASME Pressure Vessel Code. - [1910.261]
Whether the individual retirement account (IRA) payroll deduction program of the Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) would constitute an employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(2) of ERISA.
The pay plan described would not be in compliance with the MW provisions in the second month, as it offsets commissions prevously paid to the salesperson.
This button allows you to download all records in the database as of 1:00 am ET today into a CSV file. Please note that record changes made today will not be reflected until tomorrow.