Advisory Opinions
Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1. The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.
AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
---|---|---|
01/15/1981
404(a)(1) 408(b)(1) |
Robert A. Georgine, Chairman |
The application of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to investment programs under which multiemployer plans may offer mortgage loans to plan participants and beneficiaries. |
01/16/1981
401(b) |
Mr. Michael F. Klein, Jr. |
Whether the insurance policies would not be assets of the proposed plan. |
01/14/1981
3(2) |
Ms. Virginia M. Johnson |
Whether the Living Income Benefit (the Program) of Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Co. (the Employer) must comply with the reporting and disclosure requirements of title I of ERISA. |
01/14/1981
3(1) 3(5) |
John Van Wijk, Esq. |
Whether a group insurance plan covering domestic sugar beet workers employed by beet growers contracting with The Great Western Sugar Company (G.W.S.) and paid for by G.W.S. is covered by ERISA as an employee benefit plan. |
01/12/1981
3(2) |
Mr. David M. Monroe |
You request an opinion that the Special Severance Pay Plan of Upper Peninsula Power Company (the Program) is a severance pay plan as defined in Department of Labor regulation 29 C.F.R. §2510.3-2(b). |
01/12/1981
3(1) 406 |
Mr. Dean A. Mixon |
Whether the Consolidated Labor Union Trust (the Trust) is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) of ERISA, and whether an employee welfare benefit plan within the definition of section 3(1) can be maintained by more than one local. |
01/05/1981
3(1) 3(4) 3(5) 412 |
Mr. Thomas W. Stram |
Whether group insurance plans offered by the Michigan Dental Association (MDA) constitute employee welfare benefit plans within the meaning of ERISA section 3(1) and, if covered, the extent to which ERISA requirements concerning bonding and reporting are applicable to MDA or its Board of Trustees. |
01/02/1981
407(d)(5) |
David E. Gordon, Esquire |
Whether the shares of common stock of Santa Anita Realty Enterprises, Inc. (Realty) and Santa Anita Operating Company, Inc. (OC), as evidenced by “back-to-back” stock certificates (the Paired Shares), constitute “qualifying employer securities” within the meaning of ERISA section 407(d)(5) with respect to the Plan. And further, whether the Plan's holdings of the common stock of Realty and OC violate ERISA section 404(a)(2) or 407. |
AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
---|---|---|
12/22/1980
408(b)(5) |
John W. Rossitter, Esq. |
Your submission concerns the prohibited transaction rules provided under sections 406 and 408 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act), and section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (the Code). |
12/22/1980
103 |
Mr. Homer L. Elliott |
Advisory opinion regarding (1) the requirement contained in section 103(a)(3)(A) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) that a plan engage an independent qualified public accountant, and (2) the requirement of section 103(b) of ERISA that a plan include in its annual report a report from such qualified public accountant regarding the financial status of the plan. |