Advisory Opinions

Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1.  The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.

Data Dictionary

1980
AO/ Date/ Reference Recipient Description of Request
07/22/1980
3(1)

J.B. Nelson, Director
Compensation & Benefits
McDonnell Douglas Corporation
P.O. Box 516
St. Louis, Missouri 63166

Whether the sick leave benefit plans of the McDonnell Douglas Corporation (McDonnell) described as PN 508 Sick Leave Benefit Plan – Salaried MDC-West and PN 509 Sick Leave Benefit Plan – Salaried MDC-East (the Plans) are employee welfare benefit plans within the meaning of ERISA section 3(1).

07/15/1980
406(a)

Mr. Douglas B. Kramer
Young & Alexander Co., L.P.A.
Suite 100
367 West Second Street
P.O. Box 578
Dayton, Ohio 45402

Whether certain transaction between Capitol Plumbing and Heating Supply Co. ("Capitol") and the Capitol Plumbing Profit-Sharing and Thrift Trust do not constitute prohibited transactions under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

07/11/1980
3(1)
3(5)

Mr. Philip R. Hinderberger
Counsel, Department of Insurance
State of California
100 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco, California 94102

Whether a certain trust known as the "RETA" Trust and the benefit plan established in connection with it (RETA Plan) is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) of ERISA and, if so, whether the Department has promulgated regulations regarding the definition of church plan under section 3(33) of ERISA.

07/19/1980
3(2)

Mr. Stuart J. Offer
Morrison & Foerster
One Market Plaza
Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105

Whether a program of supplemental benefits to former employees by the Crocker National Bank (the Bank) constitutes an employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of ERISA section 3(2).

07/09/1980
3(1)
3(5)

Mr. Donald A. Dowdell
Attorney, Legal Division
Insurance Commissioner
Office of Treasurer
Tallahassee, Florida 32304

cc: Small Business Independent Trades Association

Whether the health benefits program of the Small Business Independent Trades Association (SBITA) is an employee benefit plan within the meaning of ERISA section 3(3).

06/27/1980
206(d)
403(c )(1)
404(a)(1)(A)
406(b)(2)
514

Mr. George A. Grenfell, Jr.
Assistant District Attorney
P.O. Box 12946
Fresno, California 93779

Whether, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), it is permissible to garnish the Laborers’ Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California (the Fund) for child support arrearages.
 

06/27/1980
3(1)

Mr. James N. Schuth
Miles & Stockbridge
10 Light Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202

Whether the Black & Decker Disability Plan and Trust (the Plan) is: (1) an "employee welfare benefit plan" within the meaning of section 3(1) of ERISA; (2) an "employee benefit plan" within the meaning of ERISA section 3(3); (3) an "employee benefit plan" as provided in ERISA section 514(b)(2)(B); (4) exempt from the participation and vesting requirements of part 2 of title I of ERISA as an "employee welfare benefit plan" within the meaning of ERISA section 201(1); (5) exempt from the funding requirements of part 3 of title I of ERISA as an "employee welfare benefit plan" as defined in ERISA section 301(a)(1); and (6) exempt from title IV of ERISA. You state that the Plan is provided to employees of Black & Decker.

06/24/1980
3(2)

Mr. Brian J. Lake
Thornburg, McGill, Deahl, Harman, Carey & Murray
Sixth Floor, First Bank Building
South Bend, Indiana 46601

Whether the Torrington Company Severance Pay Plan (the Severance Plan) constitutes an “employee welfare benefit plan” under section 3(1) of ERISA, and, further, that the Severance Plan is not an "employee pension benefit plan" under section 3(2) of ERISA.

06/18/1980
3(32)
4(b)(1)

Mr. Gary P. Amaon
Butler, Binion, Rice, Cook & Knapp
Esperson Buildings
Houston, Texas 77002

 Whether the Metropolitan Transit Authority Union Pension Plan Local 260, TWU, AFL-CIO (the Plan) is a governmental plan within the meaning of ERISA section 3(32) and thus, is excluded from coverage of ERISA title I requirements by ERISA section 4(b)(1).

06/09/1980
3(32)
4(b)(1)

Mr. Gerald A. Sumida
General Counsel
Center for Cultural and Technical Interchange Between East and West, Inc.
P.O. Box 656
Honolulu, Hawaii 96809

Whether the Center for Cultural and Technical Interchange Between East and West, Inc. Corporation (the Corporation) is an agency or instrumentality of the Government of the United States, or of the Government of the State of Hawaii, or of both and whether the pension and welfare plans of the Corporation are covered under the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).